
Because men have been "conditioned" to expect Brazilians, this woman needs to have one right away. We wouldn't want this woman to have any say over her own pubic hair, would we? I mean, she clearly states that she doesn't think Brazilians are necessary for a relationship, but apparently she's wrong in Suzi Godson's eyes, as only a woman who conforms to her boyfriend's pube desires really deserves relationship status.
Godson's answer, though it comes with a great deal of apologetic buildup, is basically yes. She explains to the woman that the pornification of the world is greatly responsible for younger men's tendency to expect a hairless woman. "There is something hugely irritating about being forced to conform to an aesthetic ideal instigated and perpetuated by the porn industry," Godson writes, "but, like keeping one's armpits and legs smooth, it is now expected. If your boyfriend has been conditioned to expect a tidy Brazilian, he may genuinely find anything else very off-putting."
Is this the same as women expecting men to shave their whole body (back, chest, stomach, pubes)?
Maybe it is our most current culture that wants this as "civilization" - remember until 1917 it was normal for men to have a beard but the "arrow shirt man" changed all that
It's not "porn" as much as fashion, and the wearing of even skimpier clothes / swimwear
I would agree, but have you seen some men at the beach with the bellys hanging out over the spedos or boxers... Yikes!!
I don't think they care so much about appearances.... and some of the men in these soft core porn movies... I would say the same thing...
Although, I dont think it is as much about "porn" specifically as I do think it is just the double standard.
A thought just occurred to me. What about the amatuer porn stuff that individuals are posting on the Net? Are they copying the body hair/lack of body hair choices of professional porn producers?
I don't know... but here is something that has been plaguing my mind this week:
I don't like Carrie PreJean... I think she is an opportunist, fraudulent, phony....
I find what her ex-boyfriend did to be offensive. I realize that young women today should be more weary of sex-ting or making homemade porn with boyfriends and sadly husbands, because you never know one day if it will be used against you.
It is too bad, that there are not more honorable people in the face of anger with someone.
Carrie is, however, an example of stereotypical imagery these days. Regardless, this guy says he has more footage and wants to sell....
I find that disgusting.
Regardless, this guy says he has more footage and wants to sell....
I find that disgusting.
If, as has been reported, she was 17 when she made the video, I find that illegal.
She is the one saying 17, he is saying she was not only 20, but she has asked him to lie about the age discrepancy too.
I don't know which individual is more credible.
When did she get the silicone? Does the video show them or the original equipment?
I don't know on both questions. I did not (and don't want to) see the video, and not sure how old she was when she got them "enhanced".
Wasn't she 22 in the Miss USA?
If she was 17, he needs to be prosecuted.
I'm sure a lot of young women will grow older wishing they hadn't taken those photos or videos. Others will not. For better or worse, it is becoming the new norm.
However, it will haunt at least some of them. Last year, I read about an exemplary teacher being fired because boys at the high school where she was teaching found a porn video she made when she was young. They brought it to school to share with each other. Nothing happened to them. She was out of a job.
Yup... and prospective employers are combing Facebook for information on those who turn in a resume. Job market is tough, they will look for the edge. Some cut throats may even turn in some of these "Girls Gone Wild" tapes to bump someone out of the way...
I just find it extra disgusting that someone you were once intimate with would sell you like that... it is pretty cold.
Making a tape like that shows a level of trust in a relationship. For him to turn it over to the lawyers or the media, should make him a social pariah. I wouldn't trust him enough to date him. Why is his photo not all over the papers, with the caption "This man will sell your romantic history" or "Beware: don't date this perv"
Why is his photo not all over the papers, with the caption "This man will sell your romantic history" or "Beware: don't date this perv"
Because the media wouldn't be able to buy future videos from future pervs who suddenly found a way to cash in on the naivity of the girls/women they used to date. If the pervs knew they'd be the face on the front page, they wouldn't sell and then how would the media make their necessary ratings?
Exactly... the media can be quite hypocritical.
It doesn't bother me, not one iota, that a woman has pubic hair.
I only hope that this article represent just a small minorty of my younger counterparts. Because if they are taking their que from porn as to what a woman should look like, then we are in a sad state of affairs.
I don't think that men are "conditioned" to expect a Brazilian any more than they are conditioned to expect garter belts and black stockings, also staples of porn. If some guy is expecting these things, then the clear conclusion is that his sex life primarily revolves around video, and interactions with Rosie Palmer and her five sisters.
lol, Dave, right on.
I've long thought porn was a problem for our teens. They go there seeking to learn about sex and find a whole lot of distortions, including how our bodies should look, both male and female. No one can live up to the body distortions promoted in porn, whether it is enhance body parts, airbrushing or whatever.
There was an article a while back about how porn is changing the sexuality of teen girls because the boys expect them to perform like porn actresses (ie they are being pressured to engage in lesbian sex while the boy(s) watch).
Since porn ignores relationships and focuses solely on sex without emotion, it doesn't surprise me that this is the direction that our society seems to be moving.
I was on another seed that proves Loretta's point. There was a man on there talking about sex being the total reason for just about everything. He was talking about women even with (paraphrase) gorgeous bodies being boring after and more than 2 mos of putting up with that was equal to a life sentence..He said all he liked was the "conquering" of "targets" and all of his friend who were married went on "business trips" but one wouldn't leave his wife, and that the others had "girlfriends or mistresses, all "of course" younger than their wives, and that since he was "well off and good looking" he would never get married (thank god for the women) but he actually asked what in life could possible be better or worth more than sex?
I didn't ask him how old he was. I asked if he were yanking my chain and this was a goof but he continued on in the same vein as if I were the crazy one. He never mentioned, love, or relationships, or responsibility, or brains or heart once.
It was one of the scariest things I have ever read. Sometimes I feel that my family lives in a fantasy land where we have been left in the past because to us there is more than this total obsession with sex. It seems like the porn gets uglier and uglier working its way back to the Marquis de Sade.
I can understand not wanting to be in a marriage type relationship for any number of reasons. I can understand still wanting a sex life, but I can't imagine wanting only a sex life and having just about everything from my looks to my wallet, to my soul caught up in sex. To me that is just weird and sad. I think it inevitably leads to the objectification and degradation of women and then just as directly to rape as if a woman or girl or child is just there as an object for someone else's sexual gratification--what do we expect to happen. I think by now many rapists don't even think what they are doing is even wrong--how scary is that? We have been so totally desensitized and as Loretta has said , young girls now think that it makes them sexy to act in ways that are totally to please boys. Once again the concept of the girl or woman being a sexual being instead of a sexual object and toy or video for men and boys is being lost and fast--very depressing--I really am glad that I am old and that one of our daughters is a total hippie and an overconfident woman, because in this culture she is going to need every ounce of that overconfidence to survive. Our other daughter is really caught up in the gross popular culture as she is mentally challenged, and continues time after time to be a vicitm. Pathetic.
Right on, millerb. I thought that in the 60s, humanity had transcended this objectification of women as sexual toys only, but it's back even more blatantly than ever. It's horrifying, truly horrifying.
Brazilian any more than they are conditioned to expect garter belts and black stockings, also staples of porn
Folks, I know it's hard to get educated about a subject while riding a horse oh-so high, but now days, American porn is all about total nudity, body piercings, tattoos and just being plain crude.
FYI: In porn, the shaving goes for both women AND men....but acknowledging that little fact wouldn't allow the few to endlessly play the oppressed victim, now would it?
The question was asked if porn men also shaved, so no one is trying to avoid discussing that. Why pretend that anyone is?
Comparable questions would be: are women demanding that men shave or wax too? Are men feeling pressured to comply if they are? Is porn the cause of the pressure on men to wax?
If so, that's as wrong as the other way around. But I haven't heard men complain that they are feeling pressured. Have you?
I've long thought porn was a problem for our teens. They go there seeking to learn about sex and find a whole lot of distortions, including how our bodies should look, both male and female. No one can live up to the body distortions promoted in porn, whether it is enhance body parts, airbrushing or whatever.
I don't think it is the porn so much as ... "modern opinions". If you look at old porn, the image is ... bush. Even some of the images today show trimmed bush...
There is just a click that prefers "clean"... and it permeates the entertainment industry. No you don't see the visual, but you hear it in music, or the celebrity discusses it.
I seem to remember this discussion in the Vagina Monologues... and Real Sex.
I don't think men are necessarily encouraged or expected to shave or wax in their nether regions, however, I do think that many feel it necessary to wax or shave their chest. IMO, I prefer a man with hair on his chest. Why on earth would I want to feel like I was with a 12 YO boy? Yikes!!!!
I'm with you. I like hair on a chest. In high school, my best friend's brother was a muscle builder. He got rid of his hair all over his body. Thought it was weird then. Don't like it today either.
I find some hair on a man's chest to be quite sensual...
Interesting angle with the pre-pubesnt age. I sometimes wonder if it is an legal way of dabbling in having sex with someone underage.
I can't speak towards any general trend, only from my personal experience, but many women I've been with have expected me to be shaved (though none expected me waxed), and seemed to think that it was part of natural grooming along with a shaved face and clipped fingernails. Also from my own experience, while I could care less about whether a woman is shaved or not, most do seem to be at least trimmed in attempt to meet some percieved societal standard.
If we're going to get upset about the grooming of pubic hair, however, why not get just as upset about the idea that women have to shave their legs? It's obviously a sexist double standard and is done for equally sexist aesthetic reasons. I let people make up their own minds on how they want to treat their bodies. Shave, don't shave, pierce, don't pierce, cover yourself in tattoos or don't, in the end it's your body and your decision, and if someone is so superficial that their love is dependent on the length of your pubic hair...they're probably not worth the effort in the first place.
All that said, their are some practical reasons for at least keeping the pubes from turning into the Amazon, nobody likes coughing up a hairball ;-)
Andrew,
True (regarding womens nether regions). I think most women at least "groom" it somewhat, but without going into great detail, there are better reasons to keep it trimmed than attempting to sexually satisfy the opposite sex. I'll just leave it at that....
Dragonwoman,
All I know is, I would find a man who is bare down there to be somewhat psychologically disturbing. My husband has stated the same regarding women (a bare down there woman would be like being with a child in some aspects). So your thoughts as to whether it could be a legal way to dabble in some, well, lets face it, pedophilia like behavior may be closer to the truth than most would want to admit. I wonder if men that prefer no hair are also the ones that prefer small breasts or overall a more childlike physique.
If so, that's as wrong as the other way around. But I haven't heard men complain that they are feeling pressured. Have you?
Pressured? Heck no. I volunteer, as do most men I've ever talked to about it (like... three of the four I've ever asked--so it isn't a particularly large survey).
Women should choose for themselves, as should men. I, for one, would never try waxing again. Just getting it on my legs hurt like hell. Shaving is a different issue altogether.
But everyone should go by their own preference, and I, personally, am a fan of shaved.
I think that hairless bodies, both mine and hers, simply feel nicer, and the women I date tend to agree. There is actually a perfectly good reason to keep your pubic area shaved: it makes oral sex more pleasurable for the person performing it, if they don't have to compete with your pubic hair (likewise: boys, this is why you should lop the damn handlebars off your lips).
Maybe it is just a result of porn that the aesthetic is changing. Instead of automatically condemning it for that reason, we should wonder why it's an attractive aesthetic in porn. A lot of the moires about sex have changed, as sex became more appropriate a topic of conversation. Just because it is influenced by pornography, is it necessarily bad?
Also, to women: if you feel like the man you are sleeping with would pressure you into shaving/waxing your body in ways that you are uncomfortable with, then stop sleeping with him. He sucks.
Interesting angle with the pre-pubesnt age. I sometimes wonder if it is an legal way of dabbling in having sex with someone underage.
I don't think it's necessarily an attempt to be a pedophile, but sure: it does make you look younger. But ok, so what? How many people actually fantasize about having sex with older partners?
I don't think it's necessarily an attempt to be a pedophile, but sure: it does make you look younger. But ok, so what? How many people actually fantasize about having sex with older partners?
Well, there's a big difference in someone who sexually fantasizes about older men or women and those who fantasize about prepubesent children. Now, I know I am engaging in a bit of hyperbole, however, I insist there is something uniquely disturbing about a bald nether region in either sex. Makes you look younger? Ya, like a 10 year old. Generally speaking older adults do prefer to look younger but not to look like children.
Now, I know I am engaging in a bit of hyperbole, however, I insist there is something uniquely disturbing about a bald nether region in either sex. Makes you look younger? Ya, like a 10 year old. Generally speaking older adults do prefer to look younger but not to look like children.
A thirty six year-old woman with a shaved nether region, does not, a ten year-old, resemble. There are plenty of differences. Actually, come to think of it, I don't think I've ever seen any naked ten year-olds--so maybe I'm wrong, but I'm going to take a wild guess and assert that it's probably true.
Do you really think that an attempt to look younger is necessarily an attempt to look pre-pubescent? Or that her partner is unable/unwilling to tell/admit the difference?
Vault, I would agree with the statement if they prefer their women not only shaved but the breasts high and firm...
Let's face it, them puppies drop. So Zom is right in that a 36 year old shaved woman does not resemble a 10 year old.
I do wonder if there is not some sort of fetish involved though. Some kind of unrealistic expectation of what a woman should look like.
Look at the "Nip and Tuck" industry... getting older is not cool for many.
Kinda sad really.
Meh, to each his own, really. I do think that for some people, the attraction of bare genitals is the connection to a childlike appearance. However, if both partners enjoy the shaved/waxed look/feel, I really don't care. As long as they aren't really hurting children, I could care less what they want to do with their own genitals. And yes, I think sometimes partners are unwilling to admit the truth about their significant others. This goes well beyond the bounds of to shave or not to shave though.
Meh, to each his own, really.
I agree. Each person should make an informed choice. If one partner has a kink for it, and they're in a committed relationship, ask them to try it. If they say they don't like it, then drop it.
Women should not feel any more compelled to fulfill a a man's sexual desires than a man should to fulfill a woman's. But, that said, in a committed, honest relationship, neither one should feel any shame in expressing their desires, either, and both should feel free to say "ok," or "hell no, are you nuts?" as they so-decide.
If it isn't mutual, or if women feel like they can't bring up their own wants, they should find different partners.
So, yeah. I agree with the article: if porn is making women feel like they have to do this? That's bad. But if that woman's partner isn't making her feel like she doesn't have to do it? That's the bigger problem, in my eyes.
And yes, I think sometimes partners are unwilling to admit the truth about their significant others. This goes well beyond the bounds of to shave or not to shave though.
You're right, but sometimes that's a good thing, too. Some of us would never get a date if our partners were honest about who we are ;)
Look at the "Nip and Tuck" industry... getting older is not cool for many.
Kinda sad really.
Eh. Only if you let it be. Being good lookin' is fun, isn't it? Boy or girl, we all like to imagine ourselves looking good. I think it's only sad when it's someone else you're trying to look good for, instead of the person in the mirror.
But instructing a woman to wax simply for a man's happiness, regardless of her own personal preferences, is ridiculous. Just because men are "accustomed" to a certain thing, it doesn't mean that women have to do it to make them happy. And if a man really can't handle it, maybe it's not the pubic hair that has to go.
Wise words. By the way, what is the porn dictate for male pubic hair--much hair or what?
I'm glad I am old. People are really getting weird.
I'm with you on that one, millerb:=) I think it's the result of making sex the meaning of life.
By the way, what is the porn dictate for male pubic hair--much hair or what?
That's a good question. I suspect men are hairless in a lot of porn but really don't know. Perhaps some of porn's consumers could enlighten us.
Perhaps some of porn's consumers could enlighten us.
So you admit that you're totally ignorant about something that you're bashing and all but calling evil? LOL
If you only stopped by to bash women, then you're a troll. Please contribute something to the discussion other than hating women.
Why should people who oppose porn buy it?
I don't need to be a murderer to oppose murder. I don't need to consume porn to oppose porn. It's silly to think otherwise.
You called it crude. It's far worse than crude. Porn degrades and devalues our sexuality, women in particular. It links violence and sex, which encourages more sexual violence in our society. It is always filmed from the male POV with women only obtaining satisfaction from ensuring men's satisfaction. Treating women as an equal partner just isn't in the script.
This seed is about how porn is changing our relationships, with women being expected to be like women in porn by the men they are with. Do you have something to say about that? Do you see that happening?
Loretta,
I think you are right about the effect of porn (well, I would say hard core porn) on relationships. I think that some mild porn can have it's place. I venture to say that it's the hard core, raunchy stuff that tends to objectify more. I also think that the more pervasive pornography becomes in our society, the more the average human being is going to be judged against it. This is not too far off from the effect that Hollywood has on the collective American psyche. It is a little known fact that approx. only 3% of the population possess the genetics necessary to achieve this so called "perfect" body. There is a general misperception out there that if we would all just get off our lazy arses and exercise till we drop we could all look like greek gods and goddesses. But the fact is that the majority of human beings could lift weights, starve and exercise until literally their arses fell off, and it would get them no closer to being this "ideal". It's is rare to have large breasts and small everything else. Generally, thin women have smaller breasts, same with athletes. Breasts are composed of fat tissue and the leaner your body, the smaller the breasts. Now, thats not to say that it doesn't occur, but, you're back to your 3% of the population (hence, the disgustingly high popularity of breast augmentation surgery). And lets not even get into the multitude of body shapes and sizes, all determined genetically and there isn't jack you can do about it. Hollywood and the porn industry certainly has skewed the publics perception of what a normal, healthy adult female OR male should look like. I know there have been some studies done on the effect of pornography on young males. I will try to find the one I read which concluded that pornography can indeed cause men to no longer find their spouses, girlfriends or even your average, everyday (even attractive) females alluring. It has been proven to alter expectations and perceptions.
I'd like to read those studies. They sound interesting.
It is a little known fact that approx. only 3% of the population possess the genetics necessary to achieve this so called "perfect" body.
There have been articles where even those who are held up as the "perfect" people have said they can't live up to it either, that airbrushing makes them look better than they really are.
It's a problem even in magazines where no one is as they appear on the pages, even the models. We are letting the false images of all media dictate what we expect ourselves and each other are supposed to look like. I think it is a particular problem for the young because they don't have enough experience to know better.
Ya. It makes me think of that movie with Bruce Willis, I think it was called Surrogates (never saw it) where everyone was replaced with their "perfect" robotic counterparts. Kind of makes you wonder if thats not where we are really headed. Only plastic could acheive the perfection seen on your average magazine cover. Really disturbing, I think.
A man r woman should in general try to be attractie to the other. I see no big issue because it grows back. Still, it depends on how strongly this bothers her.
I don't think a woman should wax if she doesn't want to, even if he wants her too. It's painful, expensive and time consuming. But more than that, it's her body. Her body should look like she wants it to.
What about shaving arm pits or legs? The waxing of a hairy upper lip? Trimming or plucking of eyebrows? All are equally superficial grooming habits done for aesthetic purposes. They're equally controlled by cultural influences. Heck, even makeup, deoderant, and perfume are all superficial practices done largely as part of our cultural mating rituals.
My take is do what makes you happy. I grew up in Maine so I know plenty of hairy hippy chicks who would rather spend the day hiking in the woods than at the spa getting a wax, and none of them are ever hurting for a date on Saturday nights.
There are weeks on end, I don't feel like shaving the pits or the legs... especially in the winter.... LOL
But if one errant hair lands on my chin... that frigger is going by way of the tweezers
There are weeks on end, I don't feel like shaving the pits or the legs... especially in the winter.... LOL
rAmen to that, Dragon. Why spend money on razors and deal with stubble if you are wearing pants and sweaters all the time?
This is what I am saying...
Plus when you are rushing in the morning in the shower.. who has time for aerobics or yoga.
Imagine a balancing act while you are half asleep and the house is freezing...
LMAO... thanks Jones =}
It always bothers me when people say that women who shave/wax do it because they unconsciously want to be like porn stars. Some of us just don't like the feel of body hair. I'm Italian (and pretty sure that Chewbacca is somewhere on my family tree), and I get thick, dark body hair that I can't stand. I leave my arms alone because I went to school with people that shaved their arms and they looked really gross, but everything else gets shaved or removed. It just feels nicer to me.
I don't care if people shave or not, but it's not always because we want to please men. Some of us want to please ourselves.
I've never thought that porn caused all women to shave or wax. Some women were doing it in the 1950s and 1960s, long before porn was widely spread in our culture. It wouldn't surprise me to learn its been done for centuries.
My bush, is the biggest. It provides the cushion
TMI
Hmm, this coming from a man whose main girls are Palmela Handerson and Fistina Nuckles =)
Porn Dictates to Wax or Not Wax?
Porn Dictates to Circumcise or Not Circumcise?
Those are lateral questions full of cultural bias and fashion innuendos.
I always wonder why, when the subject is focused on women, that bothers some people who then have to try to change the focus to "What about the men?"
Since men are the constant focus of our culture and porn is framed from a male POV, why should this seed or any discussion about women change its focus to men?
As to circumcision being "caused" by porn, that's a phallusy. Circumcision have been a part of our society for as long as it has existed and was originally based on patriarchal religious ritual, as taught in the Bible.
However, I'm an opponent of circumcision. It's not as horrific as female genital mutilation, but it is still genital mutilation.
If porn is a contributing factor at this point, since men are the main consumers of porn, then men should be protesting.
If a man can live up to the porn version, then (and only then) should he expect his partner to look like a porn star. What if women said they only wanted men with unnaturally large privates? In the case of the lady writing to the help column: The next time her boyfriend says something about her hairy bush, she could reply "I'll shave when you get a 12-inch penis".
Women need to be comfortable with their own bodies. Whether to shave (or wax) or not is a personal decision. If a man can't accept who you are, then he doesn't deserve you.
since men are the main consumers of porn, then men should be protesting.
Loretta, you think that will bring back our forskins?...: )
I did wiki it and found out this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_of_Christ
I have to plead ignorance on this, now as far as waxing it seems to heighten pleasure, for me. As for porn live is better.
Loretta, you think that will bring back our forskins?...: )
No. But I also don't think there's a push to circumcise babies because of porn. That's been going on for centuries and not just in this country. I've never heard parents include pressure from porn as one of the reasons they're debating whether or not to do it to their son.
However, if it is a real problem, then the consumers of porn -- men -- should be protesting on behalf of future generations.
As to waxing, I'm not opposed to waxing if that's what the person wants to do. I am against women who don't want to wax being told by advice columnists that they must or being forced to wax by their lover. I'm also against porn being the standard by which we judge our sex partners.
"I'll shave when you get a 12-inch penis".
No thank you... too much tool for the job.
too much tool for the job
I never would have thought that you'd say that
This was an extreme example, but if men don't have the "porn look" why do they expect women to?
I never would have thought that you'd say that
There was this photo linked to another article. This poor guy had a penis that had to be at least 14 inches.
My first thought was ... OMG...Hella No!!! keep it away from me.
I can just imagine a bruised cervix... yikes!!!
There is one supposedly "scientific" researcher, Stuart Brody, whose main thesis in all of his "research" is that women should only engage in sex as the RCC has traditionally defined it. In one study, he actually said something along the lines that a "true" orgasm requires the penis to ram the cervix. The way he worded it sounded so violent it sickened me. So it isn't just porn where the idea of harming the cervix is held up as the norm.
it is pretty sad that an educated individual would think such a thing.
Someone needs to introduce this person to the real makings of the vagina.... and where X marks the G-Spot.
What is most alarming is that he is doing "studies" to prove his theories -- which means that his views will be held up as scientifically true.
I was just on one seed where the "study" was done that "proved" that women are so focused on worrying about date rape drugs they ignore how their own drinking endangers them. I protested the article, saying that wasn't true at all, that women worry about both. Finally, Chasing found the original study. Their own tables proved my view was right. Women worried about both at the same time. The author of the study wrote a conclusion in direct opposition to his own research. Even after I pointed out that he did this, some people continued to contend that his research was valid.
Those who want to blame women will do it no matter what the truth is. When it happens under the guise of "scientific" research, it becomes even more powerful to combat.
In one study, he actually said something along the lines that a "true" orgasm requires the penis to ram the cervix.
Wtf? Something tells me that you're guaranteeing orgasm won't happen for the woman, under those conditions. Further, I'd bet money on a repeat performance being out of the question, as well.
if men don't have the "porn look" why do they expect women to?
I work on my 'porn look' daily, practice makes perfect
Ya think? But then those fun guys in the Vatican, who fund his "studies," aren't much interested in women's orgasms. Their hang-up is that us radical women keep thinking wehave the right to enjoy sex. Bad, bad us. It's their duty, after all, to save us from ourselves. Teaching enough men that ramming our cervix is sensual would do it. We'd end up running for our lives if they could convince us that's all there is to sex.
In one study, he actually said something along the lines that a "true" orgasm requires the penis to ram the cervix.
Yes, luckily some of us won't ever have to worry about this.
:(
ROTFLOL. Good. As a woman, I never want to have to worry about it either.
Aww bonz... it is the motion of the ocean.... believe that.
Aww bonz... it is the motion of the ocean.... believe that.
DW is right, with the small arch of the back and the bend of the motion of the penis it will hit the little man in the boat, and the big man in the cave.
Nice way of putting it Wude.... but don't deny that little man... he packs quite a shake.
"I do look after myself (hence the gym) but I don't think that a permanent tan and Brazilian wax should be deal-breakers in a relationship. Or am I just hopelessly outdated?"
This woman is not outdated...
When you become a woman, you develope hair... I find it rather interesting that there are men who would break up with a grown woman because she does not lose the bush...
I once shaved, just because I heard about Brazilians and "air strips".
It was the worst experience... the itching after.... because it does grow back.
Would these same men shave the package completely????
and a permanent tan is just plain phony.
Would these same men shave the package completely????
I did once, and I will never do it again. Like you said, "because it does grow back". The itching was very irritating.
Not only itchy, but quite scratchy for the partner while it's growing back. My wife tried it once years ago. Never again.
I heard about Brazilians and "air strips"
Now that I have to, I may go home and try that out
DaVoH... Even the air strips grow back... and it is irritating... If you keep it up.. maybe... I just imagine bumps and ingrown hair issues...
A little trimming around the hedges should be enough.
When both of you are shaved, it's like rubbing sandpaper against sandpaper. I know, because it was a honeymoon experiment gone horribly wrong
Oh, ow. Just thinking about it hurts. Sorry it happened to you.
Even if only one person shaved, as it grows back you still have the effect of sandpaper against parts that should not be sanded. As I said, we'll never do that again.
When both of you are shaved, it's like rubbing sandpaper against sandpaper.
See....
Now if you leave the little lady alone, it would be like spun silk.
it would be like spun silk.
I was told apple pie
Was that from a movie???
Where a fella actually humped his momma's pie?
Yes, but it'll never be as good as your Mango, I can promise you that =)
ROTF.... who told??? was it that bad boy????
who told???
Remember, I can eat a peach for hours. I like the way the fuzz tickles my face and it's sweet juicy nectar, maybe not sweet, but you get the picture.
Wow =}
Grrrr, baby Yeah!!
I can eat a peach for hours
Castor Troy
Nice eye there, boneclinkz
Hey Loretta,
I got a article you may want to check out:
There are some simply amazing idiots holding public office. I wonder how hard they have to work to become that amazing. Or does it come natural?
This is the same fella that wants Texas to succeed from the union. I wonder if it is the same Governor who made it mandatory for 12 year old girls to get the HPV shot before entering HS.
I'm not sure if it was answered or not, but most men in porn are shaved/waxed these days, no chest hair, no pubic hair.
New is not improved.
Okay, thanks for clarifying that. Now on to the next question: Are women demanding that men shave or wax before they'll have sex with them because that's the way it's done in porn?
Demand? No.
A trim would be nice.
Sorry, no manscaping here.
No scrapping....just a little hedge clipping will do
No scrapping
On second thought, I'll just keep my bush
I voted for almost every post here, excellent discussion on a subject that one doesn't encounter in the everyday give and take of life.
What alarms me personally most is that porn standards are regarded by young men as the real standards for both men and women.
How soulless, joyless and sad for both.
We've known for years that girls are adversely affected by unrealistic images shown in magazines and the like. It makes sense that boys would be affected the same way. Our teen and young adult years are spent trying to figure out how to be an adult. When teens and young adults are bombarded by unrealistic images and standards, that's what they learn -- unfortunately.
There has to be a way to counteract that effect, but I haven't heard of one yet.
I agree common...
interesting subject and something you said has got me thinking "soulless"
Has the soul been lost in sex lately????
I may ponder this thought and come up with an article.
Has the soul been lost in sex lately????
What is the soul?
What is the soul?
Good question
In her post, I had the impression she was thinking of the deeper essence of ourselves in relation to sex rather than a designation of a certain, noun-based part of ourselves. Would you ask "what is a soul" if she was speaking of soul music, or would you relate the term to a way of experiencing music?
I think it's interesting that you bring up music, and sort of underscores the point I was trying to make. When she says "soul" and is actually referring to a way of experiencing sexuality, the interpretation of that experience is subjective. Think about it this way:
Many people would claim that popular music has lost its soul. But there are many people that pop music really speaks to. Rather than marginalize their experience, perhaps we should understand that "music" means different things to different people, and avoid claiming that one experience is "better" than another.
In the same way, people are looking for different things in relationships. Some people are interested in monogamous commitment and security, other people are interested in flings and hook ups. Is it reasonable to say that one experience is better than the other?
The answer is yes. Meaningless flings and hook ups are always better because you can cut all ties and bail if the woman starts to nag.
The answer is yes. Meaningless flings and hook ups are always better because you can cut all ties and bail if the woman starts to nag.
If the woman wants to nag
**giggles**
Oh my, because that is the problem ????? right???........... her nagging?
bonz... I am not going to rag on your idealizm of pop music but in answer to your statement:
Many people would claim that popular music has lost its soul.
In someways, I would say .....YES!!!! and ...
I would not leave it at POP.... I would add some rap right in there.
Of course there is soul in both rap and pop... but some are just surface.
Why bonz would she rag if there was a clear understanding as to what the sexual experience would be up front, and you and she bothered to show some care and respect towards each other?
By the sentence,
"Meaningless flings and hook ups are always better because you can cut all ties and bail if the woman starts to nag."
You would have us all believe that the woman is just a tool to you and you already have zero respect for her.
A "fling" does not need to be soulless.
I most certainly don't think that sex should lead necessarily to marriage or some kind of trap.
.... but if without soul... I would prefer masterbation. I know I have love for myself.
... but I sure as hell would not tape it and give it to someone.... LOL
There has to be a way to counteract that effect, but I haven't heard of one yet.
I've been outa town, so missed this part. I can't post links (because I'm at work), but there is a growing movement of pro-female "art-porn" cropping up.
It's mostly ex-porn star women (who become producers/directors, if they stay in the sex industry), where the women are making female-centric pornography that is intended to promote positive images of female sex and sexuality. Some of it gets a little training-video-esque, now and then, as in "watch this with your partner, and maybe he'll learn how to please you without thinking sex is just about how many different places he can put his peepee," but there is an (albeit small) market emerging in this genre.
It's often semi soft-porn, but some of it is pretty good. The problem is that, to do them well, it has to have high-production value (expensive sets/cameras/original music), which tends to be a lot more expensive than traditional and amateur porn.
One website a woman I know particularly loved was a gallery of kissing shots. It was very pretty emo boys and girls kissing sensually, without any intercourse occurring. There are other types, but that one was a good example that comes to mind.
If you really want to fix the problem, I suggest you go out, find the web-sites, and start subscribing. :)
(And no, I don't mean MET, which is the first thing you'll see if you search for "art porn.")
Real Sex on HBO has some How To segments too.
Real Sex on HBO has some How To segments too.
I have a few "How to's" I'd like to demonstrate for you someday DW =)
Oh my...
Is that for me or on me?
Is that for me or on me?
We'll make it the best of both worlds, and combine the two
You two want to get a room? Can I watch? ;~}
Can I watch?
As long as you hold this video camera
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |