"It's an old-fashioned message, that you're better off if you find a man," DePaulo tells WebMD. "It's this idea that you can be single, have your big career and all your friends, but that's not the route to happiness, it's not deep or meaningful like marriage is. That's ridiculous. The best friendships often last longer than marriages ... you don't have ridiculous expectations of your friends like you do a spouse."
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (16)
Marriage isn't a magic bullet for a wonderful life, says DePaulo. "But it has that appeal that you will meet this person and everything falls into place. Yet if you look to one person to be everything, it's not fair to that person, not fair to you, and it's not healthy. And if the marriage doesn't last, it's devastating."
One study tracking 1,000 couples for 15 years found that marriage brought only a "tiny blip" of happiness during the brief time closest to the wedding ceremony. "But on average, afterwards, people go back to way they were before. The researcher's perspective is that we each have a baseline of happiness, and marriage on average isn't going to change that -- except for that little blip," DePaulo says.
In fact, most married vs. single "happiness studies" are seriously flawed, she adds. "They lump all single people together - divorced, widowed, always-single - without factoring in the transition period, the really unnerving period in your life after divorce or becoming widowed," she tells WebMD. "Over time, you go back to the person you were before. But studies don't take that transition period into account."
- 5 votes
The only thing that annoys me about being single is people insisting that I need to have a man. Why? "To protect you." I freakin' HATE that stereotype. Of all the reasons that can be said, the people that I have met like to use the 'men will protect you because you're a woman' stereotype. I have had 2 friends who married their husbands who later turned around and BEAT their wives. Now who needs protection?
Now, I am not saying that all men beat their wives. I can protect myself, thank you very much and if that is the only reason why I need a man, then I don't need one. I am not a stereotype portrayal of the weak damsel in distress who needs a man to save her.
- 4 votes
LOL. Well said. 25% of women are the victims of domestic violence at least once in their lives, some of them are victimized regularly.
And who are the men protecting us from? Other men. So we need to take a chance that the man we let into our home won't be as violent as the men who aren't in our home.
But wait. Married women are raped and murdered too. Sometimes by their husbands and sometimes by other men, so marrying for protection doesn't work.
Women are far more likely to be harmed by their intimate partners than they are by strangers. That's a reality that those who endorse marriage don't want to deal with. They just pretend it doesn't exist or that it doesn't happen to women in their religion. But studies show the same percentage of women sitting in the pews on Sunday are battered.
The idea that women are weak is a tired stereotype that was never true. It was built on societal restrictions imposed on women. A woman in a floor length dress, shoes with heels and a corset is not going to be as active as she would be in comfortable shoes and unrestrictive clothing. Women who are ostracized for being athletic (as we were when we were young) are not going to be athletic.
We couldn't play basketball on a full court because running the length of the court was supposedly too hard on our female bodies. So we could only play half court. We were told contact sports caused breast cancer. We were cautioned against any activity that would tear our hymen because then men wouldn't want us. That includes just about any activity, including getting up in the morning. Any girl who enjoyed sports was labeled a lesbian.
Same for any physical activity. So it wasn't our healthy bodies that were weak. It was the restrictions placed upon us that weakened our bodies because we weren't allowed to use them.
- 5 votes
What annoys me is that people tell me I need a man because my children need a father. Now, I know that a two parent household is ideal, but when people tell me that my daughter is going to spend her life looking for the love of her father in @!$%# men or my son will beat his wife because a MAN didn't tell him otherwise . . . that irks the hell out of me.
- 1 vote
You have to love yourself before being able to love anyone. And being single is now a lifestyle and people and popular culture have a hard time both recognizing and accepting that.
- 4 votes
My question is why popular culture feels more threatened by women that love being single VS men. Could it be the sexual liberation part or is there more to it as I believe?
- 3 votes
Because we are traditionally a patriarchy where men are supposed to be in control of women. When a woman lives on her own, she's in charge of her life, not her father or her husband.
- 5 votes
Then patriarchy is long overdue to be dismantled. The laws around the world view women in varying degrees of property akin to chattel. The West is better in some ways but we aren't there yet.
- 3 votes
Great points everyone! Women married, had children and served their husbands, period. Any deviation to this was suspect. I was 20 1/2 when I married...I was an old maid. I was 23 when I gave birth to my first child...I was way past my prime. Actresses were over the hill at 25-30 and the only parts they could score were old lady parts. If you wanted to live alone there was something seriously mentally wrong with you.
I found, however, that living alone meant one less child in the house. I didn't have to answer to anyone but myself and decisions were easy. I didn't have to put up with adult accusation and tantrums, which was a big bonus. My creativity, motivation, joy and productivity were on a high level without a mate.
I did twenty years as single parent/single woman and loved it all. Not all men were users and abusers but many certainly felt entitled and did not reason that maybe sharing was better than expecting full service without reciprocation.
My daughter, 27 years old, told me last month that when she realized she did not need to marry or have children a huge weight came off her shoulders. I was a bit surprised she was concerned, as I was certainly not the source of her thinking she might have to marry and have children. I just believe that mindset hasn't evaporated as well as most of us had wished.
- 4 votes
One study tracking 1,000 couples for 15 years found that marriage brought only a "tiny blip" of happiness during the brief time closest to the wedding ceremony.
Really? Off the top of my head, the couples I know personally who wouldn't fit that "finding" would be aunt&uncle1, aunt&uncle2, aunt&uncle3, maternal grandparents, 3 of my closest friends and their husbands. It would be silly to say it's all perfect and rosey all of the time, but there's no doubt that to say the only "blip" of happiness was around their ceremony would be grossly inaccurate.
On my father's side, we have a huge family and I can honestly say as great as my friends are, it's just not nearly the same. I realize that marriage and kids is not a "happy thought" for some, but it's just not accurate to completely deny the new depths and dimensions of life that marriage and family bring for others. Considering how many people I can think of just off the top of my head, I'm not going to buy the argument that it is so rare.
Of course, we're into "What is happiness?" territory. That's one thing that makes surveys like this hard to quantify.
I've read studies that show that the more equality in the marriage, the happier both partners are. So how do we quantify that in a society that ranges from equality in marriage to severe repression of the woman in marriage? Comparing one to the other just can't work.
- 4 votes
Comparing one to the other just can't work.
Agreed. And the divorce rate is not a good indicator either. Both of my grandparents were divorced by the time they met. They had just passed their 50 year anniversary together when she passed away. On the flip side, that oppressed woman may never get out and will bolster the "never-divorced" numbers.
- 2 votes
Very true. And the oppressed woman won't be able to state she is unhappy in the presence of her oppressor.
- 4 votes
We've all observed unions that are abusive and difficult. Take the woman whose husband puts her down in front of others and laughs. The man who will not allow his wife to do anything without permission. The man who acts superior and is continually condescending. You know this wife is not a happy woman.
On the other hand I am living with a man I've known and been best friends with for 38 years. When we got together two years ago it was very difficult for him not to act like a fuddy duddy and issue instructions and criticize. I told him to forget about us being an item unless he could lighten up and act like an equal partner and forget about being dominant and controlling. He kept telling me I had anger issues but I knew who had the anger issues. My son came to visit and took my guy to task about his behavior. I told this man I love dearly that unless he could begin living and having fun and stop grinding his teeth over every little petty thing we were through. He gave it a try and seven months later we are best friends again and have a great time all of the time. It was worth the effort but if it hadn't worked out we would have still been friends but both happily single once again.
- 1 vote
TRUST
If you do not unconditionally trust your partner or yourself, your relationship is doomed and you would be better off single. I would have to say Trust even trumps Love!
- 4 votes
Good point. We have to first love, respect and trust ourselves before we can offer that to another. This goes for both partners. If our partner violates our trust, then what do we have to build a relationship on? To stay when trust and respect is lacking, even if we still love them, then we cannot make the relationship work nor can be trust or respect ourselves as long as we are living a wrong decision.
- 4 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



