VALIDATION – support, belief, belief that what she's suffered is abuse and is wrong, belief in the details of her story, belief that she is not crazy, belief in the sometimes unbelievable malice and planned terrorism of the batterer.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (105)
TO BE OFFERED INFORMATION about sexism, about how women are routinely degraded and bought and sold, about how her experience is part of a world wide system to keep women under control, that the tactics of the batterer are commonly used by assailants throughout the world, and by those who abuse power over others.
TO BE SURROUNDED BY PEOPLE WHO “get it” – loving family and friends, co-workers, neighbors, colleagues, bosses, health care professionals, law enforcement folk, school and day care personnel – people who understand that:“just leaving” is difficult under the best of circumstances, but almost impossible when batterers stalk, harass, gain access to their victim through custody and visitation of their children; that the batterers’ “problem” is not poor impulse control, or a tortured childhood, but “his sense of entitlement to the life, services, affection, undivided attention and loyalty of his victim”;3 and that battering is not impulsive, but instrumental – that he doesn’t have poor impulse control, a temper problem, a short fuse, an explosive personality, but that he has carefully planned the abuse to get what he wants or to punish her for breaking his rules.
- 6 votes
hey loretta! i am having trouble emailing you. write me when you have a chance ok? hope alls well.
- 1 vote
Loretta: sexism can also be woman on man. *trust me*. It all depends on how one is raised to treat the *opposite* sex. Women can be just as brutal to men as men r to women. Men need the same kind of support. Yet, they first need to know that they *need* the support and that nothin' is wrong with them, or the support they need.
- 4 votes
So true, ADad ... I should probably have substituted "he or she" for "she" when referring to the victims in my comment. My father was one such, as a matter of fact.
- 3 votes
It is true, that there are abusers, from both genders. However, there is something particularly heinous, to me, about a man, taking advantage of all the wondrous qualities of a lady, with malevolent motives.
- 3 votes
Weasels are everywhere....they are smart and accomplished at what they do to their victims, both spouses and children, and the extent to which they will go to abuse their victims...and get away with it is...well....literally amazing.
I ask, however, that the attitudes we all have towards these human predators not be allowed to get over into our attitudes about the "opposite gender" in general, as there are many good, honorable people too, and it's not fair to them to get "backlash" as a result of what some weasel has done to the victim they are with who was previously abused by the weasel.
Both females and males and all that follow in their life are all victims of abusers (weasels) and therefore, it is in everyones interests to spread the word, and make the weasels as unsuccessful as possible....
Support the victims, don't support the weasels......
- 7 votes
Male dominated religions started this whole idea that women don't have rights and are basically "property". Religion teaches girls that their value is their virginity and subsequent willingness to have children loyal to the religion. While currently Islam is the most repressive to women, western women have only emerged from thousands of years of domination and the suspension of all rights. Until women are really honest about the pope, their reverend/pastor's or islam we will stagnate or go backwards. http://christianfeminism-olderandwiser.blogspot.com
- 2 votes
Jan:
While I agree that in general religions are populated with male "leaders", if the word of the LORD is properly interpreted (at least to my reading of the Bible, etc.,...) ones spouse and children are the highest priority in the man's life.
While we as human beings maywillingly take on the responsiblities of of marital vows and covenants, this DOES NOT in any way - in my own mind - EVER equate to a female being mere "property". Nor a male either....
Were it up to me to try to start "setting the rules" I would try to not emphasize gender role training issues until near to puberty (which is linked to nutritional status so no "age" can truly be specified...), and at that time only emphasize as best I could that sexuality which may lead to the creation of life is a huge responsibility, and that responsibility should be put off until both spouses can and will be able to take care of, and raise that child. And, no, handing off to Mommy and Daddy to raise it for you is NOT a correct response.......they will both fade away and die long before that kid is fully fledged.....
One of the real areas of strife...which will continue settling out but ultimately make the United States all the more strong, is that the USA "in general" is NOT continuing to advocate male dominance in all things.
A few facts for those that think females have no role in US history or other than that of household chores and children (which are very important human activities all the same....no matter who does them...):
1- The USA fought WWII and won it in large part because "Rosie the riveter" made, tested, and delivered the means to do so to the men out "on the front lines" who ultimately fought the battles. No implements = lose the war. We won, and it was a team effort......
2- Females have tremendous insight and capabilities to communicate. At every opportunity where there is a chance, females should be incorporated into our foreign policy discussions and teams - teams made up of both males and females - as then a much broader and more accurate picture of what has and is happening can be realized. There REALLY are two different ways of looking at a lot of things - male and female - and in many cases, both lead to valuable insights. I will never understand why we would appoint only ONE person into these kinds of positions...it should be a male-female team......
The men who fear - yes FEAR - females have sought to dominate them using fear and punishment so that they will not compete with them. This is cowardly and wrong. There is a mentality in some males that females are like some animal that needs to be "trained" to act properly...which is WRONG. Both genders have typical greater and lessor capabilities, and acting as a team brings a much, much stronger team to a relationship, and helps better support families in the ways that really count, and make the USA stronger.
Persons of either gender which seek to dominate, humiliate, or subjugate the other can and should, really must, be eliminated from the societal pool. Unfortunately, the weasels among us are experts at acting the role of "decent and successful" human beings, and reproduce before the unfortunate spouse realizes that they've been cuckolded by a shyster.
It is really females in the US society who have the choice who to reproduce with, and I can only hope they learn very well how to recognize weasels, and don't reproduce with them, so over time there are fewer spouse abusers out there - whether via nature, nurture, or the usual combination of both.....
- 1 vote
US Citizen - ...."ones spouse and children are the highest priority in the man's life." No disrespect meant but the highest priority in a man's, or anyones, lives is to love the Lord with all your heart, mind, and soul first and family is second...but not any less loved by you nor the Lord. :)
- 1 vote
Kathleen: Thank you for correcting me....what you pointed out was "assumed" by me, as if that is not true. loving others is not really possible.....
Have a nice day.
Are we supposed to love the god who is going to send billions to suffer eternal torment in hell or the god "hippie" god who died for his own need for a human sacrifice for "sin? Sometimes I get really confused about the need to love a god who would just as soon torture me forever as not.
- 2 votes
Jan: One possible view is that human torment is due to and/or caused by other humans...not by GOD, and that GOD does NOT agree with such torment/torture for the righteous.
If GOD chooses to send the unworthy and minions of evil to torment in hell, that to me is up to him, and I'm sure there are good reasons for it, as those who are in the service of evil in some cases cannot be saved, and should be kept separate from those who are not, even off of this Earth..... GOD is all knowing and can tell if someone is beyond saving or not....
It makes sense to me.....
- 1 vote
If all the nobel laureates, Einstein and brilliant scientists continue to be correct, GOD was the PLANET and not the "Easter Bunny" males made up in his own image.
GOD the planet doesn't do anything to man; man does it to himself?
Certainly is looking more and more that way daily, unfortunately.
- 2 votes
Which in turn takes us full circle to Loretta's point:
Everything created by MAN (NOT God the planet) was created to keep women Second Class Citizens (ie. to control and use for his sexual pleasure)
- 2 votes
NOT according to this man, or in my own home, or in my own life......
We all have the individual capability to think for ourselves, and are accountable for our own actions once we are "adults", so any "logic" put forth to subjugate other human beings is at best questionable...except where criminals and the mentally incompetent may be at issue...which is not to be properly applied to the entire female gender......
- 1 vote
"We all have the individual capability to think for ourselves"........
Well, obviously we haven't, or both man and the planet would NOT be in the suffering mess it's in and getting worse by the hour, sad to say.
- 2 votes
US Citizen, Just got back into town and read your reply to my # 2.3 comment....Wasn't trying to correct you at all. Your facts are backed up wisely. And, you are correct, if I'm reading you right, a person cannot love another unless they love themselves and are happy with that. I'm always interested in what you have to say on any topic here on the "blog." :)
Thank you Kathleen, as I think we both are feeling much the same way about love, what it means, what it takes for real love to happen, etc.
I hope you have had a nice weekend, and will have a nice day.
US Cit.
- 1 vote
As always, U.S. C, I agree with you. Love is precious, fragile at times but has a strength when bound one to another that no one else can break, only the two that are involved no matter what temptations pass by. That is love to me.
- 2 votes
Pay attention victim-blamers and friends of battered women.
- 2 votes
There are only two things a battered woman needs... she needs to shut the hell up, and to do as she's told.
You know, I heard a statistic that 20% of women are battered... and to think, all this time I've been eating them plain.
JUST KIDDING!!! OMG I am so gonna get flamed for even making those jokes about such a serious issue it's not even funny... go ahead and do your worst, just remember you're every bit as bad as me for chuckling at them... so I'll see you in hell (for there is surely a spot reserved for me now).
- 2 votes
You really are into living dangerously, especially tonight since I just got done with a two hour (yep, two full hours) online chat with tech support that did not (no, it didn't) resolve my problem. ARRGGHH....
Are you sure you want to brave the mood I'm in right now?
- 1 vote
LOL. I won't be for long. I wanted to work off some of this agitation before I logged off for the night. But I'm just about outta here.
- 2 votes
Are you sure you want to brave the mood I'm in right now?
I've been around the vine long enough to know what kind of person you are Loretta, and I'd be happy to brave any of your moods, any day. Your worst mood is better than many viners' best moods.
- 3 votes
Why are you even here?
Because I have a weakness for cheap jokes... I can't resist plucking the low hanging fruit, even when the topic is a sensitive one. I'm sorry.
- 1 vote
You don't have to be sorry for having a sense of humor, Ben. Don't be so easily controlled, and intimidated.
- 2 votes
The last thing a battered person needs is a pity-party with 15 packages of sympathy and phony reassurance.
They need to change their self-perception from that of a wet dish rage to a strong, viable, and independent dynamo that will stand-up tall and straight, always ready, willing, and able to squash any and all violations of their personal sanctity at the first whiff of infringement or breech of trust. They need to become a warrior.
Not an easy task to do for sure, but it can be done, with effort. See TARP. (Teens At Risk Program)
- 3 votes
Did you even bother to read the piece? Doesn't sound like it. It also doesn't sound like you know much about the dynamics of domestic abuse or what they go through as they try to escape their abuser.
Women who are abused are not "wet dish rags." They are humans and deserve to be spoken about with respect. They are far stronger than the average person. If they weren't, they would not survive the abuse.
- 4 votes
Becoming strong, self-reliant, self-determined, with self-confidence and conviction are the only solutions to this problem. I can’t believe you don’t understand this.
- 4 votes
If you understood domestic abuse, you wouldn't be placing the blame on the victim by trying to say she is deficient in some way and must change herself. She doesn't cause the abuse nor can she stop the abuser from being abusive.
The article is not focused on stopping the abuser. It is focused on what she needs to get free of the abuser.
What she doesn't need is someone who thinks she is causing the abuse by not being "right" in her attitudes and therefore must change herself, which somehow will magically change the abuser or stop the abuse.
Do you blame the murder victim too? Should the murder victim have had better self-esteem and that would have stopped the murderer?
- 4 votes
Having confidence and conviction in your own determination not to be treated in a disrespectful way is all it takes to walk, or run, or fight, or call for help. Sounds real simple but without training in these self-skills it is the hardest thing to even imagine. Yes, I know what I’m talking about.
That's what TARP(Teens At Risk Program) is all about, learning the skills of self-reliance.
- 1 vote
Wow. So you think that all a woman has to do is walk away from a batterer and she'll be fine? How naive can you get?
Advice aimed at teens who are not yet in a relationship is far different than advice needed by women who are enmeshed with a violent man who has no intentions of letting them go free.
Are you aware that 70% of women who are murdered by intimate partners are murdered when they try to escape their abusers? Do you really think that all these women had to do was just walk away and the ir abusers wouldn't have murdered them? Hello? That's what they were trying to do when their abusers decided to murder them. That's why their abusers decided to murder them.
As I said, you don't know anything about the dynamics of abuse, or you wouldn't be blaming the victims with nonsense about how they just need to have the right outlook on life and the abuse will stop.
- 4 votes
I know all about the dynamics of intimidation, and it can only exist where it is allowed to exist.
- 2 votes
Sigh. Yep, sure, you know all about being an abused woman because.....you were one? You've worked in a field helping them? You've done professional research? No?
Then you're just someone who thinks they know what's best for people they've never met and haven't a clue what they endure.
We're not talking "intimidation." We're talking about criminals who are preying on victims. Criminals who stalk, batter, torture, rape and murder their victims. Criminals who do the same to the loved ones of their victims, including extended family, friends, children and even pets.
One woman near me filed for divorce, got a restraining order, moved four times (each time hiding the new place she lived) and he still found her, drug her into the street, chased her down the street in his car, and ran her over four times. She was dead after his car hit her the first time at eighty miles an hour, but he wasn't done humiliating her yet. He needed to completely mutilate her body.
That's a little more than "intimidation."
Her case is not unusual. It's sadly typical, made even sadder by people who think all a woman has to do to stop these predators is to feel better about themselves.
- 4 votes
Dale----I don't know about TARP but I've known of other teen programs over the past 24yrs dealing with domestic violence and/or addictions in the home life. My focus, my value in when I'm helpful, is 1) staying grounded in seeing the abuser realistically, and 2) dialogue.
I can't imagine any teen program suggesting what you're saying to Loretta. I think you might want to check back with someone on that before you represent their standards as you've stated. Perhaps you were given advice as applies to your particular situation -- it's good advice -- but it doesn't apply to everyone in every situation. No advice does.
- 5 votes
It's all about connecting the dots. It starts and ends with intimidation. I'm sure you know this, and yes it is sad.
But, we can nip it in the bud by learning how to be in control of ourselves.
I was a battered woman at one time . Best advice I ever got ? " Don't go away mad - just go away"
I'd have to agree with dale there on a big part of not getting right back into another same situation is changing YOURSELF. Concentrating on the abuser isn't the answer.
- 3 votes
Perhaps you learned intimidation as a victim, and your way out is to *nip it in the bud* the only way you know how. If so, go right ahead. Your intimidating backlash isn't going to hurt me, and I'm sure Loretta can take it. The hope is that when the danger subsides, you'll have compassion for others who find themselves in danger also, as in the attached article about battered women. They could use your feistiness, once you've learned to open your eyes a little wider to other forms of intimidation.
Absolutely the only person we can change is ourself. And tough, tough measures must be used. Where I come from, the advice about family/friends/community in this article are opposite. The tough part is breaking those ties, at least temporarily, to establish safety -- sometimes for a year. Dialogue/language plays a big part.
- 3 votes
I'd have to agree with dale there on a big part of not getting right back into another same situation is changing YOURSELF. Concentrating on the abuser isn't the answer.
Did you read the article? If not, why not? The article doesn't concentrate on the abuser. It also doesn't blame the victim by saying she only needs to change herself and he'll stop his criminal acts.
The latter is the usual "blame the victim" nonsense that this society loves so much when it comes to crimes against women. Rape is another where the victim is blamed. This "blame the victim" allows the criminal and his motives to go free. Why should we do that? Is there another category of crime where the actions of the criminal are excused because the victim just didn't do enough to keep herself safe?
In the case I cited, about the man stalking his ex and murdering her with his car, how would feeling better about herself have stopped him?
You and I both know it wouldn't have.
The advice in the article is to trust the woman, support her and teach her how to trust herself. That trust does change her. It allows her to go on to be a stronger person.
But Dale's "advice" is for her to "fight back" which almost guarantees the violence will escalate. She will end up being hurt worse unless she kills him, in which case she'll spend a decade or two in jail.
Battered women know better than anyone how to be calm in the face of danger and how to endure until they can be safe.
Why is is to hard to support them in the ways they need to be supported instead of preaching to them how it is all their fault?
- 6 votes
The people here who are basically defending the abusers, don't ever go into counseling for abuse victims. Better yet, stay away from battered women period.
- 2 votes
Yes I did read the article and I agree with most of it, but the outright hostility toward the abuser is mostly in the comments. The only thing I saw in the article that seemed to be perpetuating this myth was this : "
that the batterers’ “problem” is not poor impulse control, or a tortured childhood, but “his sense of entitlement to the life, services, affection, undivided attention and loyalty of his victim”;3 and that battering is not impulsive, but instrumental – that he doesn’t have poor impulse control, a temper problem, a short fuse, an explosive personality, but that he has carefully planned the abuse to get what he wants or to punish her for breaking his rules.
I do get it. I have been there and done that myself. But I know that the poor pathetic @!$%# truly can't help himself, if he could he would - but I sure can't help him and if I wanted to live I needed to leave.
Most of the men who abuse their wives don't want to be that kind of man - they can't help themselves. Most of them certainly don't plan it. Half the time they are high or drunk when they do it. They do have poor control of their temper and it may have come from the way they were raised. Unfortunately because they can't grasp their problem (or even the idea that it exists) they won't fix it. It's up to the victim to harden her heart and move on. This is absolutely the hardest part of it and can't be taken lightly.
In the case I cited, about the man stalking his ex and murdering her with his car, how would feeling better about herself have stopped him?
First, obviously restraining orders didn't help. If he's like some I know, you could even lock him up for years and he could still come after her when he got out (angry that she ruined his life by getting him locked up). But not knowing anything else about this couple - all I do know is: she was still intimidated by him, so he was still in control. Bullying the bully won't solve the problem either. Legal action is no different than violence when it comes to escalation - it's just a different style.
And not only that, but guess what? There's more out there just like him and if she doesn't solve the problem she has that allows him to intimidate her, she will more than likely end up with another one.
Actually though, I thought the article was great. It really pointed out what women really need when they are in that situation - SUPPORT. It really didn't focus on the abuser, who in my mind is the pathetic loser of the situation - who should IMO be pitied, not hated. As Kurt vonnegut says : "The opposite of love isn't hate - it's apathy."
- 4 votes
sunny- very interesting perspective on this. Did you see any signs of this bully behavior, back in the beginning of your relationship? If so, how often do you see these signs now, in other men?
And if I may ask you a very personal question, please ignore if it comes across wrong. Looking back, can you see your passive behavior, in the beginning, as a kind of permission for him to grow ugly?
- 1 vote
I'm sorry Sunnybunny, if I can retract that last question and rephrase it.
Back when things started to go bad, can you see now, that not walking out then was interpreted by him as a sign that he could escalate his bad behavior?
- 1 vote
5.14: . But I know that the poor pathetic @!$%# truly can't help himself, if he could he would
Nonsense. They choose who they abuse. They don't abuse their boss. That would be dangerous for them. They also choose when to abuse. Most abusers are very charming in public. The abuse is hidden behind closed doors. That shows they are very much in control.
Listen to the Gibson rants. He says to her, "No one will believe you" in response to her statement that he hit her in the face. He counted on that. He turns a charming face to the public and abuses in private, like most abusers. Her taping his rants changed that dynamic, but without the tapes, she wouldn't have been believed. Even with the tapes, some people are blaming her. They're outraged that she taped his abuse. To them, this is a sign that she made him be abusive. "She drove him to it."
Why not assume that she did it because she knew he was abusive and that he'd told her no one would believe her? Why not support her method of documenting the abuse? Wasn't she doing what is being said here: empowering herself? Yet people still blame her for doing it.
Listening to those tapes will enlighten anyone who wants to be enlightened as to the patterns of abuse. He makes it clear he intends to control her with his money. She states she made $100,000 a year before she met him and that he interfered in her ability to continue earning it. That's classic financial abuse.
His rage is directly aimed at undermining the very things that Dale advocates: her self-esteem, self-confidence, etc. That is where women need support. Their every essence is torn down by relentless abuse. It shouldn't surprise anyone that this happens to victims of abuse after listening to those tapes.
His threats to harm her, burn down the house, take the baby, even murder her are also typical. Why shouldn't a victim be afraid when these threats are made? Violence has already occurred i n their relationship, so she knows he will be violent. Other men have carried out their threats, why not believe he will too?
Soldiers are afraid in war zones, so why should these victims be held to a higher, unachievable standard? Did not Patton say that courage was fear conquered? Why not tell these women it's wise to be afraid and help them by positive support instead of saying, "she was still intimidated by him, so he was still in control."
She was doing her best to be in control of her own life. He refused to allow it. How is that her fault? Why shouldn't she be afraid? Didn't he carry out his threats? Would her not being afraid have changed his actions? Fear is our friend. It tells us when we are in danger.
5.15: Looking back, can you see your passive behavior, in the beginning, as a kind of permission for him to grow ugly?
These guys don't grow ugly. They already are ugly. They hide it when a woman first meets them and for as long as it takes to suck her in. Some men become violent on the first night of the honeymoon because they believe they own her once they're married. Some don't get violent until she's pregnant. Another moment in time that these men believe marks the woman as their property. Others just grow violent over time, pushing her a little more over time because it wears down her resistance.
Domestic abuse is not caused by the woman, what she does or does not do. It is caused by the man's belief that he has male privilege, that he owns the woman and that only his needs and desires matter. His narcissism allows him to treat her as sub-human without rights and not deserving of respect. In his mind, her only reason for existence is to serve him. When he is stressed, he beats her. He blames her for whatever goes wrong in his life, even when she had nothing to do with it.
Some women have better radar when it comes to recognizing these men. Those women get out of their lives early on, not because they were abused but because they picked up on vibes that alerted them that something is wrong -- and they acted on those vibes. However, most women are taught that a man who is too doting is deeply in love. That a man who rushes her through a whirlwind courtship is deeply in love. That a man who is jealous is deeply in love. That a man who just can't stop calling is deeply in love. All of these are signs of an abuser, but that isn't what women are told, so they read the signs wrong.
- 3 votes
(They also choose when to abuse.)
Exactly the point. Never give anybody, at any time the chance to abuse you.
(Some women have better radar when it comes to recognizing these men. Those women get out of their lives early on, not because they were abused but because they picked up on vibes that alerted them that something is wrong -- and they acted on those vibes.)
Exactly the point again. Being alerted to a problem and acting on those vibes is the KEY ISSUE here, I don’t understand why all the hostility, we’re saying the same thing.
- 2 votes
Because everybody isn't the same. If you have a trainer to run track meet, and you follow all the rules and win, and you think all anybody needs to do is just what you did, that's not accurate. We weren't born physically or psycologically the same.
What we do is share experience, strength and hope, and find our similarity.
Just as all men Loretta describes are not the same. I believe what she says is absolutely true for her and many others. I know she's dead-on about knowing your abuser -- know him even better than you know yourself. I find mirror image in about 80% of her experience.
We're not all cut from the same mold.
- 2 votes
(We're not all cut from the same mold.)
And that's a good thing, but we can all learn how to recognize danger signs, and train our self-defense skills to the point of knowing how to take affirmative action by leaving or defending ourselves.
- 1 vote
You began with:
The last thing a battered person needs is a pity-party with 15 packages of sympathy and phony reassurance.
They need to change their self-perception from that of a wet dish rag
Discussing the support a victim needs is not "a pity party." They don't perceive themselves as "wet dish rag" nor should they be told that is what they are.
Those are insults and yes, I take umbrage at adding insult to injury. As you've seen, victims and survivors are among those who post on my seeds. They deserve to be able to visit safely without hearing stuff like that.
If we're on the same side, then you'll want to show them respect, right?
- 4 votes
Just as all men Loretta describes are not the same. I believe what she says is absolutely true for her and many others.
If you've read the seeds on the Gibson tapes, you must have seen people posting that said, "He sounds just like so and so in my life."
Not all abusers are exactly alike (as with any other group of people) but they share common traits. Some drink. Some don't (like my ex). Some have brain injuries (like my ex). Some don't. But the patterns they use are the same. They are so predictable that advocates have devised a power and control wheel and can list the patterns of behavior:
Violence Wheel - Domestic Violence
Violence Wheel. The chart below is a way of looking at the behaviors abusers use to get and ... It is used to gain power and control over another person. ...
Not every abuser does all of those things, but most of them come into play in all abusive relationships. Those who are aware of these traits will also be able to spot abusive behavior, whether it is happening to them or to someone they love. Information is key to stopping these vicious cycles.
- 4 votes
Dale, this is my final attempt to say the same thing politely. Everyone is not YOU. I realize you're in a teen program, and it's gratifying that you're so excited about sharing what works for YOU with others, but everybody isn't YOU, and everybody can't possibly turn into YOU.
I have a suggestion. Have you ever heard of Myers-Briggs? It's usually for adults. It's a psychological test, but all the major corporations in the 90s used them for employees for training purposes, for HR and employee compability, etc. There are 4 qualities, and we each lean more to one side of the scale. One quality is Extrovert/Introvert. Another is Feel/Think. And 2 more. Which makes a combination possibility of 16. I've seen it on the internet.
Point is -- this has nothing to do at all with emotional makeup or any abuse history or family dynamics. This is a place to start, before those factors are keyed in. You'll find that not everybody is better off to follow your exact mold, but everybody IS better off to have heard your story and adapt it to what is possible for them.
- 3 votes
BS. I have been that wet, limp friggin dish rag as he screamed in my ear making me want to crawl down into the bathtub drain. I will never forget how that felt, and I have become super sensitive to recognizing that same kind of crap and I will never, ever take that @!$%# again. And it is my wish that nobody ever have to live through that helpless, hopeless, totally frozen state of mind ever. Pitty parties are just a feel good kind of thing that has absolutely no effect on that person once the party is over and they once again have to face the demon!!!
now i hot!! good bye.
- 2 votes
Dale,
I know nothing about you, but I accept you as knowing yourself -- except -- you were not a limp dish rag, not ever. That is proven by the fact that you got out and became even more determined to avoid abusers. That shows strength and courage, like I've been talking about.
Feeling emotionally exhausted is normal when a person is being abused. That's the "limp" feeling you are talking about. It's also normal to become very defensive and angry as you are trying to recover. That too is your courage expressing itself.
You'll know you've recognized yourself as a survivor when you no longer need anger to shield yourself or to keep yourself motivated, when you no longer feel like how you felt or what you did "made" him abuse you. I know because I've been there too. I'm glad enough time has passed that I no longer need those feelings to get through the day.
There is nothing you did or said that could force any man to become abusive. Your actions or words couldn't inspire a man to become abusive if he wasn't already carrying those traits within his soul.
Calling the support that we should offer abuse victims "a pity party" tells me that you believe you and all victims need to handle this all on your/their own. That isn't true. There is nothing in this world we need to handle alone. Our instincts are to help one another. Offering or accepting support is the best way we can care about one another and ourselves.
If you are alone, then you should find a new system of support. Everyone, including yourself, deserves that. That's what the article is about.
- 4 votes
Thanks Loretta, but that was years ago, when i was a kid. he was not an abusive dad at all, but he did give me my first good ass whooping that left an impression. and that is the main purpose of a good ass whooping.
but what i have seen since then a thousand times is that same kind of in your face hollaring and intimidation crap that just pisses me off.
the only kind of support anyone can depend on when facing these demons comes from within. We came into this life alone and we leave alone and we have to learn to get along alone cause when that demon is in your face, you are alone, so kick his ass or cower in fear.
- 1 vote
There are many, many other options to "kick his ass or cower in fear." A strong person doesn't need to be aggressive or violent to be strong. A person who experiences fear is not a coward.
Have you read Gavin de Becker's books? I have one: The Gift of Fear. It is an excellent resource for women on being safe. He makes the point that we should learn to respect fear as an emotion. It alerts us to danger long before we perceive the danger intellectually. He discusses how to recognize our intuitive feelings and why we should react on them instead of following society's rules. We are the only species that teachers our young to ignore their emotions and intutions -- and that is why women end up as prey for predatory men. It's a good read that I recommend highly.
If your dad made you feel as you described, then yes, he did abuse you. Non-abusive parents do not make you feel that way. Neither do non-abusive friends, siblings or lovers.
While you are right that in the moment of danger, you might (or might not) be alone, you don't have to face the aftermath alone. You don't have to endure continued stalking, violence and murder attempts alone. That is when you need to reach out or be provided support the most. That is what the article is about.
- 3 votes
Loretta, the very first word in the article sums it all up....."support."I've never seen a case, including my own, that there was not a need for support, especially the protection of the battered woman's mind! Law enforcement officers are starting to get it, pretty well now, that their not only dealing with wounds one can see but, sometimes and even more devastating, the wounds of the woman's mind and soul. Emotional turmoil, severe lack of trusting anyone, not wanting to be afraid........that takes a lot of support from family members, and many different agancies. Please, let's NOT forget the menwho are beaten to pulps by their wives! I was on the Subic Bay Hospital Board and we put the "Charter" for all overseas military bases together. The very first thing that started showing up was spousal abuse and I mean horrific cases! People started coming out of their hiding places and started talking or we'd see 'emcome through the Emergency Room. Both Women and Men. The mental torment these people went through was lessened when we took the cases, did the investigations thru JUSMAG and prosecuted the guilty individuals. (The men were usually civilian dependants abused by their military wives, but not always, and the battering was no less severe in impression than the women we protected.) Over the years I've seen the charges for domestic battery go to more severe levels but still women and men are brutalized by their supposed loved ones. *O.J. Simpson's wife, Nicole, and her boyfriend Ronald Goldman come to mind. We worked that case and O.J. was as guilty as hell. Karma caught up with him though, hehehe! *face resting on palm - why wasn't the fact that he sat on the "Swiss Army Knife" Board ever brought to light; Why wasn't the fact that Nicole was nearly decapitated and the slicing blade side matched perfectly to the massive cut marks she took to the throat? Why wasn't the fact that the "grating" marks found on Mr. Goldman's neck matched the large Swiss Army knife's opposite grating, or scaling, blade and fact the "gratings" matched perfectly when compared with the size knife that that box had held...and, gee, there was a police dept. photo of the Swiss Army box the knife came out of and the photo was taken in O.J.'s home in his master bedrooms bathroom where the box was perched on the top of the tub and the top cover had been slid over the bottom cover as it had been opened for use. This was a case that involved stalking by O.J., spying into her bedroom, scaring the hell out of her every chance he got, phoning and threatening her night and day; intimidating her boyfriends, threatening her dates, and then killing Nicole and Ronald. (after so many "tells" and many 911 calls the police ignored because Simpson was a Heisman Trophy winner, a former football star), Escalations like this are all too common. A pure passion/psychotic murder and I've seen my share of these cases. That's why "Battered (Women's) Syndrome" is such a vital crime to delete ASAP both legally (ramp up the charges) and informatively - SUPPORT & LISTEN to the abused, please. I just told you of the classic case of a battered woman (and gentleman) who died because of who her husband was and sloppy police work
- 1 vote
Well said. Glad to hear you are addressing the issue in the military because the military sure didn't want that to happen, especially when the abuser had just returned from combat.
Most people don't know that the enforcement of military DV regulations varies from base to base depending upon the view of the commander of the base. He can quash anything he wishes. Too often, the DV victim was the one quashed until recent years because DV advocates were making a loud public din. I hope it has gotten better since then.
OJ was definitely a case of valuing the criminal over his victims. It happens too often when it comes to DV. While we posture as a country that doesn't tolerate violence against women, our actions speak just the opposite. Neighbors look the other way even though they know of the violence next door. The media tries to pretend there is no rhyme or reason behind DV murders. Instead of interviewing DV experts, they ask next door neighbors what they think. One of the most common answers from neighbors is, "I don't know why he killed her. He's a lot of fun at parties and makes a great steak when he barbecues."
One one seed about Gibson the other day, a man from Montana was posting in support of Gibson. One of the things he said was -- yep, you guessed it -- that he supported Gibson because he'd come to Montana and throw a great steak barbecue.
Pretty sad when a woman's life is less important than a steak dinner.
- 4 votes
The military has come a long way from where it was in the early 80's when this Charter and implementation of such was put in place at Subic Bay N.A.S., Philippines and also announced in "The Stars and Stripes" (the Militarys' newspaper). The latent and usually more dangerous type of abuser is what's called a controlled split personality. "He's a lot of fun at parties and makes a great steak when he barbecues." Mel Gibson has shown his true colors, finally...we all knew, in the line I work in, that his temper was terrible but only the look in his eyes and a trained professional eye could see it, until now. He's sounds as if it may be 2 possible problems; bi-polar with psychotic tendencies or PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). This was intimated in an interview with "Entertainment Tonight" in 2002 by Mel Gibson. So, he knew about his mental condition. And, since he did then why didn't he and his doctors monitor his blood serum levels, for what ever meds. he should have been on, and his psychiatric health better? It is not up to me to diagnose Mr. Gibson but I can tell you this - he was aware by admission that he had an alter ego and gave it a name in 2002. He is responsible for every action he undertook on or off any medications. And that makes him guilty of not controlling his mental health nor keeping up with taking his meds.( he'd already searched out a doctor); thus causing negligence within his own self-control and severely harming this woman. He should serve time in prison for his beating and smashing the teeth of his baby's mother. And while she was holding the baby?! What an ignorant, out of control thing to do (that could have been avoided if he was taking medication and therapy for his condition)..he could have caused that baby to fall out of the mother's arms unto the ground. * eyes rolling in disgust.
- 1 vote
Part of the allegations is that he hit the baby while he was assaulting the mother. DCFS is doing an official investigation. I'm sure their findings will be part of the custody battle.
He is aware of his condition. In a text message to Oksana, on the day after the assualt, he said he was "unsafe for you...last night." In the same message, he said he'd been to see his therapist, so at least he was seeing a therapist at that time (per him). But when she tried to find out the name of his therapist, he wouldn't give it to her (on the tapes). Either way, he knows he has a problem and needs a therapist. If he's diagnosed with bipolar (which is what is claimed), he knows he needs to address that too.
In the text, he asked her if she got her teeth fixed, so he also knows he's doing real damage to her.
The denial by the ex wife means nothing. It is possible he wasn't violent with her and is violent with Oksana. He's been on a downhill slide for a couple of decades and the wife left him in the 1990s even though they did not divorce until Oksana became pregnant.
I hope this leads to him getting the help he needs. He's the only one who can make that decision though. His future is in his hands. I hope he doesn't decide to keep sliding down.
- 1 vote
Loretta, I think it's a shame and a disgrace for any of this to have happened. "Part of the allegations is that he hit the baby while he was assaulting the mother." Loretta, he may be aware he has a mental condition but to tell someone "unsafe for you....last night" has very little baring on him knowing how to handle his condition, obviously he didn't. If he had just found out that he had a mental disorder that would be a whole different ballgame but he'd known since 2002!!!! Either his doctor can't help him comply or Mel's not taking his meds. or he needs to be court ordered to comply and that shouldn't be too hard in prison. With what you just posted I would think it's bi-polar and off his medications.....his celebrity should NOT come into play once he's in the courtroom and at trial. Let's see if it does.........He is in need of some serious therapy and could have been abused and we are seeing the fruits of that horror. Who knows.
- 2 votes
storyartist- Re #5.8 ( I can’t imagine any teen program suggesting what you’re saying to Loretta.)
I just checked with my sources with TARP (Teens At Risk Program) and it is assumed that these basic principals of individual growth are universal concepts. The hands-on experience with learning self-defense skills is an individual control issue of the self and the body, and we feel it would apply to an abused-adult equally as well as it does to an abused-child or abused-teen.
Having control over one’s own body and mind consists of affirmative action (motion), and those steps must be learned and practiced until they become proficiently skillful and natural, then the overall effect becomes that of having self-confidence, with options. It works for kids and we feel that adults could benefit from having this kind of self-confidence as well.
The empathy lessons learned with working directly with abused animals has the self-identity benefits of relating to and understanding how the healing process works, and it brings out the need and reality of getting past the pain and moving on with purpose. My sources feel that these insights and lessons would apply equally as well to adults.
The patience and empathetic understanding of how a dog understands and learns complex sequential training tasks in agility training is a key to understanding how we learn and how our kids tick and learn and understand.
The healing process of getting past abuse is found in moving forward with positive and affirmative action towards a purposeful goal. It works on dogs, horses, kids, teens, and we feel it will work with adults too. IMHO
- 3 votes
Dale,
I've tried searching for the program without success. Most of what turns up is generic "teens at risk" information or info about the TARP legislation having to do with bailing out banks. I found one reference for the program you are describing. It was on the Simi Valley official website. It merely contained the name and a phone number.
If you want people to learn more about it, you should see if they have a website. If so, you could post the url.
I agree with all you posted. I've spent my life working with animals. I was a professional horse trainer for many years. Have always had horses, including now. Also trained dogs. Have always had dogs and cats too. Have also worked with other animals.
The program sounds like a good program. However, what they are discussing doesn't have a lot to do with what this article is discussing. It is discussing the period when she is trying to escape. She may or may not have been able to move out yet. She is still in danger. She is still trying to navigate the legal system and all the other things that need to be done.
She is moving forward with a purposeful goal: staying alive, staying safe, becoming permanently free from a violent criminal, and keeping her children free from a violent criminal.
What you are describing might be good for her to try at a latter stage of recovery. It would be an added complication at this stage. Depending on how dedicated he is to finding and harming her, being involved in a group like this may be too stressful for her because she would then have the additional worry of being vulnerable while participating and/or the possibility he will harm others in the program too.
- 2 votes
Loretta- The TARP (Teens At Risk Program) is in its infantile stages at this point but a full description of it and how it can apply to a victim in 'clear and present' danger can be seen by reading my article "Rape and Abuse Happens, lets move on to Damage Control."
- 1 vote
Damn lawyers are dragging it out with negotiating fees for liability claims they haven‘t designed loopholes for yet, might just have to stay low-key for a while longer.
- 1 vote
That's a well written article. I fully support programs like that and have even taught in them.
However, they aren't practical for battered women. Most women have responsibilities. They can't attend a program far away for an extended period of time. They have jobs, children and the like. Usually their children are traumatized too, even if they've never been directly hit.
The emotional abuse is insidious. It isn't a one-time event. It's ongoing and pervasive. It continues long after the victim has been able to get physically free.
John Bradshaw, who writes about recovering from child abuse, wrote that we need to learn how to grieve all that we received and didn't need -- and all that we needed but never received.
Grieving is an important part of the healing process. Without it, a person does not heal. Grieving requires us to give ourselves permission to hurt, to sit still and feel the pain. As long as we try to short-circuit it, we are harming ourselves. Buried emotional pain is like being on a hamster wheel. It keeps going round and round and round but never makes progress.
That is too often the missing part of programs like this. In the rush to "move past it," grieving is ignored. I hope that isn't true in TARP programs, and it might not be. But it is something to think about.
It seems that part of the program is tapping into one part of the grieving process -- anger -- to provide motivation. That's good, but it also needs to be recognized as a stage to be transcended before healing is complete.
- 2 votes
I don't agree with dwelling on the grieving part, that's negative training and it is not positive.
She is not burying her pain or ignoring it, she is facing it head-on, and kicking ass. She's going to be a warrior.
- 3 votes
You need to learn about emotional healing. Pretending we don't have to deal with emotions is not the same as not needing to deal with them.
If doesn't matter if a person wants to grieve or not. They've been through severe trauma and need to grieve that trauma in order to heal. If they try to avoid it, they will only succeed in burying it. It will still be there, churning around down deep.
How is that healthy?
People who don't heal their grief end up stuck in one of those stages and cannot move on, no matter how hard they try. Denial is one of those stages, which is what you are advocating. This page is aimed at people who've lost a loved one through death, but it applies to all losses, including the loss of our feelings of safety from violence, the loss of trust, and the intgrity of our soul caused by deep, prolonged abuse:
The Seven Stages Of Grief
Denial. This is your mind's attempt to protect you from the reality of the loss. You may lie to yourself and think about the person as if they were still alive. A certain period of denial is normal but if prolonged, it can keep you stuck and prevent resolution. There are many forms of denial, as varied as people are different from each other.
They loved and may still love their abuser. They don't have to hate him to want the violence to stop. They know their trust was violated, as was their soul. They want him to be better too so they can be together, but they know that can't be forced on him, so they have to treat losing him as a loss in the same manner as they would his death. In many respects, it would be easier if he was dead.
Those who do not grieve the losses due to DV will find themselves unable to trust or love again. You would be doing a lot of harm to them by telling them "don't dwell on it" as if their losses are superficial and no big deal.
She is not burying her pain or ignoring it, she is facing it head-on, and kicking ass. She's going to be a warrior.
You don't need to feel like a "warrior" if you've healed. Healing brings peace, not war.
- 2 votes
I only know what works and what doesn't work. When I look around at the mess this society is in with endless therapy sessions and drug abuse (prescription) I see what doesn't work.
I guess we must agree to disagree on this, if you can agree to that?
- 3 votes
I don't know any women's group that helps battered women who advocate "endless therapy" or "drug therapy."
Battered women aren't mentally disordered. I find it offensive that you would even imply that. They deserve to be shown respect for what they've endured and the emotional consequences of that abuse.
What is wrong with too many in our society is pretending that having emotions is a weakness. That too is abuse. It is abuse that is fostered by the patriarchal tenets that say women are weak because women are emotional and men who show no emotions are strong.
Forcing men to act as if they don't have emotions is the root of the abuse they inflict. I'm sure you didn't click the link about grieving, but if you had, you'd see it is part of an anger management website. It's time we stopped passing on the idea that a lack of emotion is healthy. It isn't. It causes violence and harms both the individual struggling to pretend they don't have emotions and the people around them.
- 3 votes
You mentioned your experience with working with animals. The beautiful thing about animals is they live only in the moment and that is where the healing process takes place. Dwelling on what happened in the past and focusing on why it happened and the whole blame issue routine is counterproductive to forward growth. Face the issues, state the facts, plan the future and MOVE FORWARD.
You also mentioned all the excuses, problems, and complexities of having jobs to go to, kids to take care of, bills to pay, and at the same time the pressures of avoiding being killed by the perp. Looks like a priority problem here. It seems to me the best and only viable solution would be to remove the victim and kids, immediately, to a safe place where their focus could be on healing. The TARP (Teens At Risk Programs) are set up just for that kind of safe-haven for second chances.
Abuse is a universal problem not limited to women, and, specializing in only that specific area greatly limits the overall perspective range of association with others in similar situations. Spousal abuse, child abuse, animal abuse are all related, in that they are all victims of sociopathic behavior from a perp that was never socialized properly as a child in empathy and respect for others. It is not an emotional denial issue of the he/she type as you described. This is not to say that there aren’t women who hate men, or men that hate women, there are, but that is a result of improper socialization as children or other circumstances as an adult. There are many, many women and men out there in this world who are completely emotionless, and that is a sad sociopathic problem we need to address in our country and in our school systems, but that is another issue.
The problem with America, as I see it, is that we talk too much about our problems . Discussion is good, support groups are good, brain-storming is good, but there comes a time where action speaks louder than words, and that is what TARP (Teens At Risk Program) is all about. Minimal talk with just pure unadulterated action in empathy training, patience training, self-defense training, animal training, mentoring training, affirmative action training, and just simply learning how to live in the moment, with purposeful goals to work towards. Getting away from the theory and back to the nature of living.
- 3 votes
It seems to me the best and only viable solution would be to remove the victim and kids, immediately, to a safe place where their focus could be on healing. The TARP (Teens At Risk Programs) are set up just for that kind of safe-haven for second chances.
Do you have the funds do to this? There is a woman beaten every few seconds in the US. 25% of women have been abused by their SO. That means we have millions of victims. Do you have money to house, clothe and feed them? If not, how do you propose to do this?
There are many, many women and men out there in this world who are completely emotionless, and that is a sad sociopathic problem we need to address in our country and in our school systems, but that is another issue.
The primary characteristic of a sociopath is that they don't feel emotions. So how does telling women to "stop having a pity party" (stop having emotions) help this issue you don't wish to address?
The issue of sociopaths is the one we should be addressing because they are the people most likely to harm other people. Instead, you want to blame the victim and tell her to "just get over it" while ignoring the criminal.
What's new about that attitude? That's what this country has always done. Blame the victim. Exonerate the criminal because she somehow caused him to be violent.
- 3 votes
This is a very complex problem with many levels and layers and you keep mixing and matching points to a very frustrating degree, and putting words in my mouth that I did not say. I am beginning to wonder just what your motives are, but I digress.
(Do you have the funds do to this? )
The TARP (Teens At Risk Program) is a nonprofit organization that funds itself mainly, but receives grants from sources that agree with the principals. Most of the staff, mentors, and teachers are victims themselves and/or are just people (volunteers) who have dedicated their lives to helping others. (See Sally show Dick and Jane how to kick the bag. ) The key here is, there are no six figure professionals to support in this effort, only the victims and they support each other, think camaraderie. I suspect this is where a lot of the resistance comes from, but I digress.
(So how does telling women to "stop having a pity party" (stop having emotions) help this issue you don't wish to address?)
We seem to have differing opinions on what emotional support means. Telling a victim, it is not their fault, is only advantageous if in fact they think it is their fault in the first place. Continued denying of something that does not exist will, in fact cause it to exist. (Example- If you keep telling me that I’m not fat, I will begin to wonder and self-examine my features in the mirror just to make sure, and that is when I notice my bloobs starting to grow bigger. - Poor example, but I digress.) The emotional support that really has value is in the art of moving forward with positive action, not just talk, talk, and more talk.
(The issue of sociopaths is the one we should be addressing)
This is indeed the issue we need to address, at the beginning stages, way before it even becomes recognized as sociopathic behavior. It starts in grade school or before with narcissism and total lack of empathy for anything or anybody. ( e.g. Intimidation- Bullying ) This too is addressed in the TARP (Teens At Risk Program)with hands on examples in dealing with animals and life in general, with mentors showing and doing every step of the way.
I’m going to digress just one more time and tell you I am very pro-death penalty for child abuse and rape cases, with my only reservation being that of false conviction but that is another issue all together.
- 3 votes
You're not going to convince me that adult women with adult responsibilities will benefit from a children's program or the simplistic thinking you're engaging in.
Women are not children nor are they mentally incompetent. They are perfectly cabable of assessing their own lives and deciding their best course of action. They deserve to be supported in the way they say they need to be supported. They don't need lectures from men who've never experienced a woman's life. They have the right to have their intelligence and experiences honored. That is not accomplished by men telling women how they need to act or be treated. That's patriarchal thinking at its worst.
BTW, your excuses for TARP told me all I needed to know: they don't have the money to do as you are demanding women do. That's what I thought.
- 2 votes
Dale95 - "It starts and ends with intimidation." Dale, it may start and keep being fed by the perps intimidating tactics that usually grow more intense with every bought of abuse but it often doesn't end with intimidation unless you can call a dead body the most lethal form of intimidation. I understand what you're saying but intimidation is secondary to the control mode most abusers feel the need to express - control is enforced on the abused by intimidation of the abuser, in most cases I've handled. Lots of intimidation going on these days and parents watch your children with a hawks eye, btw.......and life goes on. Dale, have been outta town for a couple of weeks, on and off, so I'm glad to talk with you my friend. :)
- 2 votes
Kathleen- my whole point is, the mind-set that makes a person victim-material. I know it all comes down to assertiveness and that comes from self-confidence which comes from self-efficacy which is experienced in actual, physical action in a practice mode or mentored in through example. The conviction of commitment to just say NO!!! This is what all our kids need to learn in grade school, self-protection skills of conviction. A perfect example was just seeded today, you've got to read it.
Pint-sized schoolgirl, 12, foils hooded burglar... with swift kick in the groin
http://cartooncat.newsvine.com/_news/2010/08/03/4806427-pint-sized-schoolgirl-12-foils-hooded-burglar-with-swift-kick-in-the-groin-
- 1 vote
Hi Kathleen, Just read your entire comment and welcome back. I've got tunnel vision, but it's blurry though. While you were gone you may have missed two other seeds that show how the girls (all ages) are kicking butt on the perps. YOU GO GIRLS!!!
Great-Grandmother, 73, Fights Attacker, Tooth & Nail
High School Cheerleader Tackles Thief
http://maddad0467.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/27/4763533-high-school-cheerleader-tackles-thief-
- 2 votes
LMAO!! Go Granny Go!! Dale, that's funny as hell!! I get what your saying...teach children to defend themselves and they won't have as bad a chance at becoming victims. This subject is about abused women and men, however. I really have had a slamming bad time the last 2 weeks hunting, yeh, the whole 9 yards of crawling around on my stomach with a bunch of my dudes (crew) to get a really vicious set of fellas, rapists and a couple of murderers, somewhere in Florida, I can't break protocal, and I'm frickin' tired!! I'm Cheering for the teenager that whooped some azz, also. I love it!! Dale95, thanks. I wonder sometimes if my work is doing any good at all and you come along and kick me in the pants and I pull myself up by my boot straps and keep on truckin' down the highway, so to speak. I feel better already. :)
- 1 vote
#5.6 - I know all about the dynamics of intimidation, and it can only exist where it is allowed to exist.
Dale, bear in mind that intimidation can begin in a subtle manner and be well established by the time the victim recognizes the problem, by which time her self-esteem is likely to be already seriously damaged. Another factor that limits the victim's options and greatly complicates her response is that she often has children who are hostages to a horrifying and worsening situation. Then it can become a choice - or at least a perceived choice - between standing up to the abuser and protecting the innocent.
And that is why so very much support is needed - not only in helping the victim understand the nature of what she is dealing with and recognize that it is not her fault, but also in offering her a means of escape, a safe haven, and help in rebuilding her life and her children's. Even so, as Loretta mentions, the existing support systems have often failed miserably to protect those who do escape. We need a great deal more.
- 2 votes
Forgive my bluntness - but what she really needs is the strength, courage and confidence to pack a suitcase and walk! It'a the insidious, systematic erosion of confidence, the mental cruelty that paralyses and eats at the soul. A re-education of the spirit and mind is her immediate support needs.
- 4 votes
I noticed you didn't bother to give a solid strategy except "pack her suitcase and walk." Are you aware that a woman walking and carrying a suitcase won't get far before her abuser finds her and batters her again for trying to escape?
What about her children? Should they to be consigned to walking with suitcases? How about the pets? Where would she carry the necessary paperwork, and how would she carry the money she's going to need? Where's she going to walk to with her children? What shelter will she be able to provide them at the end of this walk? How about food? Any clue how she's going to be able to provide it?
What about her job? Should she just give it up so he can't find her? And school. If she's in school, should she quit? What about her kids? Should they have to quit school too?
Why put the onus on her at all? Why not talk about what he needs to do to stop beating her? To stop stalking, torturing and raping her? To stop threatening to kill the children if she tries to escape? How about his threats to kill the pet the children or she loves? Or stop threatening to kill her friends, co-workers and extended family? Guess that's not important to talk about because she can just "pack and walk."
It's clear you don't know a thing about what a woman needs to do to escape a violent marriage.
- 3 votes
Mighty Mouth, I wish it was that easy. Most people don't have a clue about abuse victims except to try and empathize or criticize (oh, they deserved it, etc...yada, yada) You said the answer yourself in your statement as to why some women do NOT leave an abusive situation; "the mental cruelty that paralyses....."There-in lies the major factor women will not leave......they are terrified and paralyzed to do anything for fear they will get what they've been threatened with by their abuser(s)...that's why it's so terribly important to take notice if anyone you know suddenly starts to change in personality, social settings, doesn't want visitors, doesn't answer the phone......step in, as a friend, and ask what you can do BUT don't blow the entire situation and lose her/his trust by trying to tell them what to do unless you see that this abused friend is in a fight for their lives, then...call the authorities. You may lose a friend, believe it or not, but you may just save their lives when they couldn't save their own. Loretta,your statement is right on the money, ........"won't get far before her abuser finds her and batters her again for trying to escape?"(That happened to me a long time ago and it won't happen again. That's why I do what I do - I've had everything in the book, almost, thrown at me by 20 different abusers and without the help of a trusted friend and lots of therapy when I was younger I could not do the job I do now. Catching child molesters. Very, very heated topic but I have the highest regard for your monitoring your article posts. You're very attentive to what is being blogged and that keeps a topic like this from turning into a circus. Thank You, my friend.
Thanks Kathleen. I try.
BUT don't blow the entire situation and lose her/his trust by trying to tell them what to do
I don't think most people realize how she will receive what they think is a friendly piece of advice.
She's being told day in and day out what to do, how to do it, even what to think. He has a deseperate need to dominate her every thought and action. He needs to literally dominate her soul. Most people ignore that part of abuse. They look for physical bruises but ignore the bruises on her soul. She's so filled with pain inside (far exceeding bodily pain) that she does her best to be invisible as a means of escape.
When another person arrives with the same "Do as I tell you" statements, she receives it as more abuse. They don't mean it that way, but her soul is battered to the point she can't receive it as less extreme.
So she tries to evade them in the same way she tries to evade her abuser. They perceive her avoidance as an insult, and the situation deteriorates even further.
What she needs is for the people around her to respect her by listening. As you said, if she can't make the move toward safety herself, call the cops, but don't lecture her. It simply drives her into a more desperate corner.
- 3 votes
Loretta, Bless your heart. I've been in exactly the same situation you speak of. The dudes dead now.....not by my hand nor anyone I know. I told him he would die screaming for all the evil he'd done and he did. His house was on fire and he ran back inside to get something he thought was important.....the house collapsed around him. Mind you this was a man that fooled me totally. Ida, Arkansas is where he died. I was already in California working another job. Sometimes, you have to push the hell outta yourself and get things done. I love the "Rainbow hippies" that took care of me and my daughter while we stayed with them for 2 months. The leader of the clan was a 5th degree blackbelt.....thank God for him. The guys left me and my daughter alone, if'n ya know what I mean. My daughter takes no chit from anyone as far as abuse goes and the one fella that did smack her I kicked down a flight of stairs.....oh, well...no more motocross for him, lol.
- 1 vote
Well Loretta, I actually do know something about what happens - However, from a British perspective. If she takes herself and the children down to the nearest police station, she can press charges and they can get him removed. There are specially designated officers to act on her wishes - The alternative is, from there she's escorted to the nearest domestic violence unit. - A safe haven where a support system kicks in - emotional, legal and financial assistance is provided. This includes Social Services, Social Security and Legal Aid and even though they work in conjunction with the refuge - not even they are allowed the address This probably doesn't begin to do the subject matter justice and I would elaborate alittle longer, but it's 4.30am here.
- 3 votes
That may or may not happen here. The idea that it is so very simple for women to leave is not borne out by facts. Even when the police get involved, he gets bail (low bail at that) and is free to return to harm her, even though there is a restraining order. An RO is not much good when he's intent on controlling her and/or killing her.
There aren't enough domestic violence shelters to house all the abused women. There is more funding for animal shelters. In fact, here in California, one of the first things Schwarzenegger cut from the budget was all funding for domestic violence shelters. Even before then, the shelters were overcrowded.
It's all nice to pretend all a woman needs to to tell the police and go to a shelter to stop a man determined to find what he considers his possession and to either get her back at any cost or kill her. But that's isn't real life in too many instances.
Where does she hide after she leaves the shelter? What about if she has a teenage son (shelters don't allow males over a certain age)? What if no shelter has room? What if she has to keep working and he knows where she works?
You didn't answer what to do about the kid's school. He has the right to know where they go to school, which means he will also know where she'll be every day. He can hide and follow her home. It also means he can go there and remove the children and use them as hostages.
So please don't act as if all she needs to do is "pack and walk." No break up is that simple unless the couple is not living together and does not share any assets or children. Even then, if he is determined to harm her, it is not simple for her to just walk away.
I just love the "just walk away" attitude in that it implies she has to be the one to give up her entire life and all assets while he -- the criminal -- gets to retain his life and all their assets, including those she owned before she met him.
Why punish her for what he's doing? Why not hold him accountable and tell him to "just walk away"?
- 3 votes
Although relevant - not every case scenario you mention above will be a representative of any one individual life experience. It may well prove to be a combination of two or three of those factors at any given time, but it is doubtful ALL at the same time. Indeed, each problem will of course have to be addressed and resolved on its own merits and on the basis of an individuals particular needs. Every situation is unique and sometimes complex. However, whatever coping strategies a woman may have used with more or less success, there comes a time when the only option is to take her children and to 'walk' - It is the first step to empowerment, help, support and information aimed at assisting victims to make informed choices and find permanent routes of safety, sending out a clear message that she is NOT alone. A healthy support system is out there, if you are prepared to make the first move.
My comments are written in conjunction with the information I have provided above - none of which were in any way meant to be disrespectful or flippant with regards to the complexities of the argument.
- 2 votes
I'm glad you didn't mean to be flippant. Too many people who haven't a clue what it takes for a woman to leave an abusive situation further abuse her by pretending she hasn't got the brains to have already considered leaving and doesn't understand what it takes to leave.
Your first post sounded like it was along that line. Stating all she needs to do is pack and walk does not recognize the immense complications in the lives of battered women. While not every problem will occur in every situation, we should respect these women enough to know what does and does not pertain to their situation and that they need to be careful if they try to leave.
Leaving heightens the danger. Here in the US, three women are murdered every single day by their intimate partners. 70% of them are murdered because they were trying to escape the control of their batterers. So leaving a batterer should never be treated as a casual occurrence. It can have grave consequences to everyone in the victim's life.
A healthy support system is out there, if you are prepared to make the first move.
That is not true in many areas. In fact, most rural areas have no support system at all.
- 3 votes
Kathleen, I cannot begin to imagine the pain and mental anguish you must have endured - one of the most difficult case scenarios I ever came across was where the abuser was a policeman and his colleagues closed ranks against her, giving her a credibility problem. However, she was strong, 'came out fighting' with hard evidence and finally prevailed - every case is unique! It is not my intention to libel, demonize nor condemn - but if the victim won't leave - or they won't seek help - all we have is a stalemate, with FEAR the decider.
- 2 votes
I hope in England the children are taken care of more than here in the U.S., Mighty Mouth. "I do what I do because of what I've been through" and it started when I was almost 3 years old. But, I started heading for the positive healing without a map and made it. Some are not so lucky. I will not hesitate to intervene in a situation where a child is being abused in any way shape or form and I can do so legally. Mighty Mouth, children deserve our respect,admiration and protection. I stop and smell the flowers now and have for a while. To walk in the shoes of an abused person cannot be done except by the abused. Bless your heart. You sound like a very concerned person when it comes to women's abuse problems, thank you very much. I do it for a living now and have for 34+ years. Going after child murderers,( the biggest cowards that ever walked the face of the Earth), you name it I do it because I will not allow a person to inflict their angst on another helpless person. No matter how young or old.
- 2 votes
'I do what I do because of what I've been through'....
Kathleen, your post is magnaminous and beautiful - as are you. The scars of your experiences have seemingly made a lion of you! - May the Lord bless and keep you always.
Peace.
- 3 votes
That's very kind of you, MM. I'm a lioness for sure. A person hurts a child and I bite real hard legally. Older folks also....the helpless is who I love to protect but education of the entire population would really be a Blessing. I'm talking with the schools here in the Keys about starting a parental protection session. Not a sermon but an ongoing situation that will educate parents as to every aspect in my experiences and others I've known or helped. Children are pure...it's the input parents, friends, authority figures, and jerks on the street and t.v. that curdles a kids brain and up becomes down. Everything is about sex and kids are spoon fed "it" from the time their let loose on the t.v......you would be surprised what I and my crew have seen in children that they had been taught by one or both of their parents as to what is ok to watch on t.v. and "other" things...
- 2 votes
You clearly have a passion for your work - I would imagine it preoccupys a great deal of your time. Your kids are lucky to have you!
I have to sign off now Kathleen - have a lovely evening!
- 2 votes
I know when I was in that kind of relationship, I didn't want anyone to know. As funny as it sounds, I didn't want anyone to think bad about him. And I know it sounds cliche' but I loved him. He had problems and I wanted to help him through them. And I actually did. That is rare, I know that. He never did it again. I know that for a fact.
I always hate when someone says about the women that stay in an abusive relationship, that they must like it. They don't. Some people are just forgiving to a fault. And sometimes a man's possessiveness is confused for love because you're young and naive. If you know anyone that is starting to date, you should tell them what the difference is. They might not know.
- 5 votes
A man who really loves you will make you feel GOOD about yourself - NOT bad and in angst when with him.
- 2 votes
New Haven.....That is very true. I learned (the hard way) you have to go by their actions, not what they say or what you want to believe.
- 3 votes
Dr. Phil says that until he's blue in the face:
"I go by peoples actions......NOT by what they say."
- 2 votes
lol I don't watch him anymore. I used to. :) The one I remember is..."How's that workin for ya?" ;)
- 3 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



