Pierre-Andre Chiappori, an economics professor at Columbia University, writes in his working paper, "Fatter Attraction: Anthropometric and Socioeconomic Matching on the Marriage Market," that a little extra cushion around the waist on a man is not a big deal to attractive women, as long as he's rich. For women, this model is flipped – men will overlook extra weight in a woman with more education.

- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (3)
The paper says that those looking for a marriage partner think about physical and socioeconomic attractiveness. Chiappori and his co-authors Sonia Oreffice and Climent Quitana-Domeque, created a formula which says that for every 10% increase in a man's Body Mass Index, his salary must increase by 2% in order to continue dating in the same arena. However, women who weigh more by two BMI units compensate with a year of extra education, rather than money.
The paper is part of research being conducted independently on the subject of matching, Chiappori said. Since the 1980s, the "college premium," or return on investment for attending college, has doubled. However women are more willing to go to college for this reason than men, he said.
"When you go to college, you reap two benefits," Chiappori said. "You completely change your marital prospects and are more likely to be in a high-income family."
- 1 vote
I think it's true wealthy men can get more women even if they are unattractive. However, I don't hear a lot of men saying they'd overlook a woman being unattractive if they have Phd's. I could be wrong, but a high quality education doesn't seem to rank at the top of most men's list.
- 3 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



