Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Loretta Kemsley's column >>

LORETTA KEMSLEY

Home Page
Remember all Men would be tyrants if they could. If particuliar care and attention is not paid to the Ladies we are determined to foment a Rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any Laws in which we have no voice or Representation. Abigail Adams
Articles Posted: 79  Links Seeded: 2538
Member Since: 1/2009  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Unnatural selection: Is evolving reproductive technology ushering in a new age of eugenics? - The Globe and Mail

Seeded on Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:57 AM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: The Globe and Mail
health, genetic-testing, designer-children, embryo-selection, ivf-screening
Seeded by Loretta Kemsley
Advertise | AdChoices

Recent breakthroughs have made it possible to scan every chromosome in a single embryonic cell, to test for genes involved in hundreds of “conditions,” some of which are clearly life-threatening while others are less dramatic and less certain – unlikely to strike until adulthood if they strike at all.

And science is far from finished. On the horizon are DNA microchips able to analyze more than a thousand traits at once, those linked not just to a child's health but to enhancements – genes that influence height, intelligence, hair, skin and eye colour and athletic ability.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Loretta Kemsley's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: America's CHILDREN, American Progressives, Anti-Discrimination, Digging for Knowledge, Femvine, Free Spirits & Thinkers , Free Thinkers, Get On Your Soapbox, Gut Check America, Holistic Wellness, Human Rights Vine, IndianTalkingStick, Progressive American Rights, Psych, Soc, Philos, Soapbox, The Coffee Club, Women in Religion, Women's Issues, Women's News, World News and Views, WTF?, You Couldn't Make it Up!
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (3)
Loretta Kemsley

Critics ranging from religious conservatives to advocates for the disabled worry that a new age of eugenics is rising, propelled not by racists, despots or elitists but by parental aspiration. Says Bernard Dickens, an expert in reproductive law and bioethics with the University of Toronto, this technology is “all part of the quest for the perfect child.”

That quest was once the domain of science fiction. But last year the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration compiled a list of the most plausible sci-fi films. From thousands of candidates, NASA picked seven, led by the 1997 thriller Gattaca. Set in “the very near future,” it depicts a eugenic dystopia created by embryo screening, in which people born naturally suffer in the shadow of those who begin life in a lab.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:59 AM EST
WaltUU

And all the meanwhile, the problem of too much reproduction gets ignored, or worse, denied.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:16 AM EST
Loretta Kemsley

Yeah. That's the biggest problem they ought to be tackling, but there's no profit in telling people to stop having babies while making designer babies is immensely profitable. IVF typically costs thirty grand or more. These "enhancements" will add even steeper costs and (supposedly) will bring in new customers -- fertile couples. This high cost guarantees it will create a new elite class of designer babies on top of the other elitist classes already looking down in disdain at other people.

  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:00 AM EST
Reply
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com