White Nationalists Share Spotlight With GOP At CPAC | National Memo | Breaking News, Smart Politics

Is that what they really want? Or are they just stupid?

Can't it be both?

The shocking part? That none of us are shocked...

That should scare the hell out of all of us.

No, it isn't shocking. Any time conservatives talk about "multiculturalism", we should expect to hear from these kinds of people. It's not just Brimelow and Vandervoort, either. This is from an article about John Derbyshire's book, We Are Doomed:

Unsurprisingly, Derbyshire describes himself as a biologian, subscribing to biological determinism in every area, even to the extent of the negation of free will.

...and there's Serge Trifkovic:

A guest lecture sponsored by the Serbian Students Association (SSA) of the University of British Columbia was cancelled Thursday after Srdja Trifkovic was denied entry into Canada.

Trifkovic, known for his contentious views on Islam and the Bosnian Genocide, was set to deliver a lecture entitled, “The Balkans: Uncertain Prospects for an Unstable Region.” On Thursday, it was reported that Trifkovic spent five hours detained at Vancouver International Airport before he was sent back to the U.S

...

“inadmissible on grounds of violating human or international rights for being a proscribed senior official in the service of a government that, in the opinion of the minister, engages or has engaged in terrorism, systematic or gross human rights violations, or genocide, a war crime or a crime against humanity within the meaning of subsections 6 (3) to (5) of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.”

Frankly, I have no problem saying it either. Any black person hanging out with this CPAC crowd is a spineless sellout.

Everything about CPAC says "we embrace racism and hate people of color" and it's been that way for many years. Now that we have a black president they've upped the ante and are putting racists on full display while house Negroes like Clarence Thomas, Alan West, Herman Cain sit there showing every tooth in their mouth and clapping like little school girls.

You are correct. Any black or Latino person voting for the GOP is almost certainly voting against their own interests, and the same can be said for poor whites.

In the GOP/TP vision of America does Herman Cain and Alan West and Clarence Thomas really believe there will be a place for them?

Of course they do! Sellouts always convince themselves that they are better than the masses.

Cain and West both go on stage and the first thing you notice is that in order for them to be recieved by the white tea crowds they have to say very nasty things about black people. In other words, "entertain us". Short of that - they are not welcome.

Cain does it every time he goes on stage and so does West. The moment they stop "entertaining" and denigrating their race to the gratification of the laughing white tea parrty - they are finished.

Cain doesn't call himself "Shuckey Duckey" for nothing! He's being paid to call himself that!

Cain and West are poltical Vaudeville tap dancers that the tea party uses to help justify their racism - all that's missing is the white clown face!

For every African American, Latino, Asian, and every other minority who vote Republican, this should be a "red flag." Xenophobia runs deep with them.

Than same xenophobia runs deep with many minority Republican voters, even in regard to the minority groups they themselves belong to. There were no black people on that panel, but it's not as if they couldn't have found one to participate.

Sad, but true Plantsmantx.

They'll all be on stage dancin' a jig for massa before this hootenanny is over!

@BobbyG,

Don't be too hard on Allen West, Herman Cain and Clarence Thomas. After all, "our" blacks are better than "their" blacks. It must be true---Ann Coulter said so.

Do I really have to add there is a LOT of sarcasm and facetiousness in the above statement?

And some folks say that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are race hustlers? They got nothin' on this triumvirate of slickee-boyz...and in fact, should take lessons from them.

The beard?

First of all, La Raza is not a "mexican" supremist group.

There is no group named "La Raza".

There are organizations with "La Raza" in the name, but that could be any number of organizations. I'll assume you mean the "The National Organization of La Raza"

The nomenclature "la raza" doesn't have the same cross-cultural meaning or inference in mexico that "race" does in english. Depending on what culture you are in, it could mean a whole lot of things to a whole lot of people but it is rarely used in racist ways except by people who are decidedly anti-latino.

The National Organization of La Raza is not a discriminatory organization. It is not a party of hate mongers since it does not have a supremist or even remotely discriminatory agenda. It is designed purely to help poor and exploited minority members. That's it. It doesn't rally against other races. It doesn't march up and down the street saying how evil non-latino's or bad non-spanish people are.

They don't roll that way.

There is an enormous world of difference between an organization designed to pull minorities up to equal rights status and those of white supremist organizations that are designed to push everyone else down.

As for the original Black Panthers, they were pro-minority for all minorities. Not just black people. You are confusing the Black Panthers with the new pretenders to the throne, the New Black Panther Party which are a bunch of racists with quite a lot in common with the red neck idiots of the Klu Klux Klan except that NBPP is far, far smaller with only a tiny handful of members, less organized and have are far less violent (and less prone to violence) than their KKK opposites.

You want to talk about "white guilt"? I don't know anything about that.

However, I do know what white supremist apologists sound like.

You took a bunch of talking points that you don't either don't know anything about or that you felt you could make sound bad out of context, and tried to say they were the same thing as groups that print literature with slogans like "Hitler was right" and book titles like "The International Jew".

Guilt? I guess a person would have to be able to feel shame for that right? I think you got nothing to worry about in that department.

In the early 20th century, the cognate term "the Race" was used to refer to African Americans in a similar way – to show ethnic pride – particularly by the African American press, with terms such as "race man" and "race woman" used to refer to individuals who demonstrated pride in their ethnicity. Today the term primarily survives in the terms "race music" and "race records" for music of the era targeted at this demographic.

So White Pride Bad anyone else Pride ok? Now if they preach Violence against anyone else I agree. But the post dont say that above. Its all about how bad white people are.

And Im no where near A white Supremacist or I wouldn't be married to a Native American girl. But I have no problem being proud of my heritage like anyone else or race.

Chris, it's the National Council of La Raza, but beyond that, which I admit is just a small quibble, you're absolutely right. Conservatives are given to saying just "La Raza" as a ploy. They want people to confuse the NCLR, which is a thoroughly mainstream organization, with the Raza Unida party, which was a radical organization, or thought to be:

http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/war01

I see that David- 1830107 has tried the same ploy with the Black Panthers, and...yes, what you said:).

You need to order the sheets in extra small and the hoods in 4XX! That way you should have the right size!

Loretta: I don't disagree with you.

But, I have met many good people who support Republicans but are unaware of most of the issues or actions of the party. They vote for their candidate and feel they have done their duty. I feel that if they really understood the situation, they would have voted differently.

What I am trying to describe, it's hard to break it down, but I am a divorced, single woman with no children. I have had jobs that required me to do alot of research. I have worked with, both at work and in my community, highly intelligent people. So, I am comfortable researching* various topics in order to understand them. (*That does not mean I am an expert.) I feel I see a bigger picture.

Yet, some of my friends who are parents are overwhelmed with children, family, spouses, and jobs and see the world differently than I do.

I have friends who literally live in the bubble of the past when things were wonderful and they refuse to look at the present difficulties and they are Democrats.

I have some Republican friends who latch on to one issue, say taxes, and that is all they focus on and these people are highly educated.

I could go on, but for me, I blame Democrats for not voicing their message clearly and repeatedly which leaves a vacuum which the neocons filled with their talking points.

Why are most public television and radio stations owned by neocons?